Which morph would hold its value better in the long term?
Pied or Clown? Just wondering
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Re: Which morph would hold its value better in the long term?
Sorry administrators, I posted this in the wrong forum
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Re: Which morph would hold its value better in the long term?
Nothing
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Which morph would hold its value better in the long term?
Sooner than later they will be probably 150 bucks
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Which morph would hold its value better in the long term?
Aw
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Re: Which morph would hold its value better in the long term?
But pieds ( from what I've seen) have held their value pretty well considering
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Re: Which morph would hold its value better in the long term?
Which do you like better? Eventually the economics of this hobby reduce the prices to the point of negligible. Both will probably run neck and neck price wise since they are both recessives. I know you hope you can at least sell enough to cover your costs, but what if you can't? Don't worry about the money and produce that which excites you the most. That will be way more rewarding than $$$.
Re: Which morph would hold its value better in the long term?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GonzalezRoyalPythons
Nothing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GonzalezRoyalPythons
Sooner than later they will be probably 150 bucks
FWIW, these comments are coming from a guy who is getting out of the hobby (or at least all but doing so to re-prioritize life).
Re: Which morph would hold its value better in the long term?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
monty_python9
Pied or Clown? Just wondering
I would say flip a coin to get your answer. As recessives, they will both certainly stand the test of time better than most incomplete dominant morphs. Having said that, the low-end Pied market (single gene stuff) is probably better long-term, as they are so unique that they appeal more to the masses.