Flying turkey ruffles feathers about 'emotional support' animals on planes
http://www.foxnews.com/travel/2016/0...ls-on-flights/
This story really brings home the difference between a true "service animal" under the ADA (see http://www.ada.gov/service_animals_2010.htm) and the legal requirements that businesses must follow when making accommodations for them, versus what is needed for a mere "emotional support animal" (ESA).
I also noticed that snakes are specifically prohibited as ESA's by the airlines in the cabin area, which IMO is stupid. Unlike cats, dogs, monkeys, and birds/fowl, which are being permitted:
- They have no dander so there are no worries about allergic reactions from the other passengers.
- They're not going to jump up and slobber all over everyone on the plane.
- They are quiet.
- They are easily contained in a bag or rubber tub.
- Their "output" can be regulated based on feeding schedule.
Re: Flying turkey ruffles feathers about 'emotional support' animals on planes
it’s frustrating that so many people have a fear of snakes...but does that have to be taken into consideration because the number is so high? Looking at it from let’s say United Airlines prospective things get a little tough. if they allow snakes...someone will be seated next to a passenger that has one. if that passenger express discomfort they have to find someone willing to switch seats before the plane can take off (they have to do the same with dogs). When the flight attendant ask if anyone would be willing to sit next to the passenger with the snake less people will be inclined to make the switch and passengers that have a deathly fear of snakes will hear the announcement and could possibly go into freak out mode (again this would delay take off which would have a negative effect on their customer service.
its not fair. and a big part of me wants people to be exposed to snakes because well...they are great for all the reasons you listed and way more. but its hard for commercial business to take that stance.
Re: Flying turkey ruffles feathers about 'emotional support' animals on planes
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kokorobosoi
Do you know I found a warning label on my curling iron that said external use only? I had to just stare at it in disbelief.
Knowing every label has someone's name on it.... Holy crap ow!
Re: Flying turkey ruffles feathers about 'emotional support' animals on planes
I get that people use animals for emotional support.. Thats fine.. But really, one cant go to a freakin grocery store without taking ur damn dog... pets/svcs pets w the exception of dogs helping blind or deaf/hearing impaired..should not be in the damn store where I shop for my food. It makes me sick. Then they put their damn dog in the grocery cart as if its a grocery item..yep, I wnt to use that cart nxt for food after your pet laid in it..no thnk U.. Let natural selection do its job.