Re: man kills giant burmese
Yeah... no. He was right to have killed it. They're devastating the ecosystem.
Sent from my Gameboy using Tapatalk 2
Re: man kills giant burmese
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ChaosAffect
Yeah... no. He was right to have killed it. They're devastating the ecosystem.
I wasn't aware of their effects on the ecosystem. I just can't imagine killing an animal like this.
Re: man kills giant burmese
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Cortland V.
I wasn't aware of their effects on the ecosystem. I just can't imagine killing an animal like this.
They're escaped/freed pets that have no natural predators in the Everglades. Big problem. So big that the government actually sponsored a hunting competition for them. It sucks, but as great as they are as pets they're terrible for wildlife.
Sent from my Gameboy using Tapatalk 2
Re: man kills giant burmese
Quote:
Originally Posted by
STjepkes
Yeah well, all this Burmese noise in Florida sounds more and more like propaganda to me after that monumental failure of a round up they just had where 1600 "hunters" found a whopping 68 pythons out of the estimated thousands. It sounds like these estimates may be incredibly exaggerated.
I don't think you understand how it works with invasives. You don't wait until there are so many of them that they're a problem. You try to wipe them out before it gets that bad. If only they'd done this same thing with fire ants a hundred years ago...
Sent from my Gameboy using Tapatalk 2
Re: man kills giant burmese
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ChaosAffect
I don't think you understand how it works with invasives. You don't wait until there are so many of them that they're a problem. You try to wipe them out before it gets that bad. If only they'd done this same thing with fire ants a hundred years ago...
Sent from my Gameboy using Tapatalk 2
And when did I suggest that you should wait to address an invasive species problem? I don't recall, but thanks for telling me what I understand. I understand the incredible range of invasive species Florida is vulnerable to and the importance of maintaining an already delicately balanced ecosystem of native species. All I stated was that I believe the estimates they've been shouting about for the last few years are questionable after their big event and little results. "Little" being relative to the number of animals removed in relation to number of "hunters" participating. I also understand that, hey, if 68 snakes are what they could remove, then great, that's certainly a step in the right direction.