Re: Dooms Day Ark 2013 AD
I would take 1.1 Normals...
Re: Dooms Day Ark 2013 AD
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Vypyrz
I would take 1.1 Normals...
I think I would second the normals, or more specificially Sub Saharan normals since their size could help the survivalibity & reproduction of the species.
Also since all morphs are just 'mutations' from the normal genes you probably don't need an actual morph to be the foundation to get morphs again.
Sure it will probably take a millenia for the mutations to spontaneosuly pop out after a few thousand generations being born ,but that sounds like the safest way to reestablish and have morphs back in the long run.
Besides starting a species using already mutated genes would probably make them less likely to survive.Whether due to overly bright color/pattern attracting predators to themselves or the repeated breeding of the same already mutated gene causing hatchlings to not thrive or survive for long.
Re: Dooms Day Ark 2013 AD
I would go with a Sub Saharan Normal Female and a YB Male. The female would give you larger clutches so a faster repopulation. The YB would throw the morph and normals so there would be a chance for variations in both. Last is you could produce a third visual instance of the animal with an Ivory. This is strictly from a selfish position where after the floods, humans would still be keepers of pythons. If we are just talking about them living as natural & wild animals again, then 1.1 Normals Sub Saharan, as the Ivories would be extremely vulnerable to predation.
Re: Dooms Day Ark 2013 AD
Male - Spinnerblast
Female - Albino Black Pastel
I figure nature could take it from there and make some awesomeness.