Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 612

0 members and 612 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,905
Threads: 249,105
Posts: 2,572,113
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Pattyhud

Isn't this wrong?

Printable View

  • 04-26-2012, 05:59 PM
    BPLuvr
    Isn't this wrong?
    While at work today I was browsing some FS threads.
    Quote:

    As for his color, none of the offspring show it as of yet. There could be something else going on. I kept back 1.2 of his offspring for myself to breed back to one another.
    To me it sounds like inbreeding. Since I have been considering breeding lately I just assumed something like this is wrong. Is this something that is OK and I have just thought wrong?
  • 04-26-2012, 06:04 PM
    Zombie
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by BPLuvr View Post
    While at work today I was browsing some FS threads.


    To me it sounds like inbreeding. Since I have been considering breeding lately I just assumed something like this is wrong. Is this something that is OK and I have just thought wrong?

    Inbreeding in reptiles isn't the same as inbreeding in mammals. It is common practice to "line" breed to try and isolate certains traits in the offspring. Its also used to try and prove out a morph. You shouldn't really inbreed more than a generation or 2 tho.

    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using Tapatalk 2
  • 04-26-2012, 06:10 PM
    satomi325
    Yup. Reptile inbreeding doesn't show the same negative outcomes as mammal inbreeding. But even mammal inbreeding won't show any defects or mutations right away. It takes more than a few generations of inbreeding for problems to occur.
  • 04-26-2012, 06:18 PM
    wolfy-hound
    Yes it is inbreeding.
    No, there's nothing inherently wrong with it.

    With some recessive traits that people are unsure about, they breed back to the same line to "prove out" the trait as being genetic.

    Technically "line breeding" is breeding to another animal in the same lineage(mom to son, dad to daughter, aunt to nephew, etc). If there is any unwanted genes, it can "double up" and be expressed or expressed more. If there are wanted genes, same principle.
  • 04-26-2012, 06:26 PM
    BPLuvr
    Wow thanks! So if you maybe want to enhance a color or pattern then you may want to breed back to the parent if I understand correctly.
  • 04-26-2012, 06:54 PM
    Wapadi
    Yes thats correct. And I agree with Zombie, I would not do more than 2 gen or so...
  • 04-26-2012, 07:08 PM
    SlitherinSisters
    Like others have said, inbreeding it's a huge issue in the reptile world, in any world for that matter, unless you inbreed generation after generation. It's openly accepted that a generation or two is a fine practice. I'm going to guess that some people inbreed more than just a couple generations so when getting a sibling pair keep that in mind.
  • 04-27-2012, 11:34 AM
    Andybill
    Re: Isn't this wrong?
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by SlitherinSisters View Post
    I'm going to guess that some people inbreed more than just a couple generations so when getting a sibling pair keep that in mind.

    Completely agree with this! I think this slips some minds. Something definitely to pay attention to and consider before breeding. This is where accurate documentation of lineage is important.
  • 04-29-2012, 12:43 PM
    Jessicat
    Re: Isn't this wrong?
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by wolfy-hound View Post
    Yes it is inbreeding.
    No, there's nothing inherently wrong with it.

    With some recessive traits that people are unsure about, they breed back to the same line to "prove out" the trait as being genetic.

    Technically "line breeding" is breeding to another animal in the same lineage(mom to son, dad to daughter, aunt to nephew, etc). If there is any unwanted genes, it can "double up" and be expressed or expressed more. If there are wanted genes, same principle.

    Honestly this is what had been bugging me about morph breeding [especially "Super" types] for a long time; I still don't think I'd be comfortable purposely inbreeding/linebreeding if I had my own, maybe I'm weird ^^;
    I do recall, a few years ago, stumbling onto a GTP or Emerald Boa breeder's webpage back when I was reading up on snakes, and they had a lot of hatchlings for sale that were missing one or both eyes, which I thought was caused by inbreeding so that was a huge turn-off for me ._.

    Thanks for this thread and all the informative replies, I understand a bit more about this sort of issue now :3
  • 04-29-2012, 01:15 PM
    Stewart_Reptiles
    Re: Isn't this wrong?
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by BPLuvr View Post
    While at work today I was browsing some FS threads.


    To me it sounds like inbreeding. Since I have been considering breeding lately I just assumed something like this is wrong. Is this something that is OK and I have just thought wrong?

    Line breeding as been done with reptiles for generations with no ill effects. Line breeding is done to prove out animal's genetics, for certain traits, etc.

    There is a big difference between reptiles and warm blooded animals but it all comes down to line breed DESIRABLE traits

    Quote:

    You shouldn't really inbreed more than a generation or 2 tho.
    Why only 2, does something happen when you breed 3 generations :confused:

    All jokes aside if I remember correctly I believe Leos and Corns have reached their 20th generation.

    Line breeding/Inbreeding is not that big evil some people make it out to be also does not mean you should not bring in new blood when you have the opportunity to do so.
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1