Re: Ball Python DNA mapping
Good idea in theory, most likely not a good thing in reality. Genetic tests are expensive and timely. Its alot easier and cheaper to just buy from reputable breeders. I had my DNA mapped and it cost me nearly $500 for all the tests and took around 3 months to get the results. Definately a very interesting idea, I'm sure people would be interested in the knowledge about certain genes but not for testing hets.
Re: Ball Python DNA mapping
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Slashmaster
I have done Gel Electrophoresis before. Very interesting process.
What lab are you going with? I was considering speaking to my university's genetics lab for headway on a similar project.
I will be performing all of the work and analysis myself. I am going to start by building a library of samples to compare to. Then move on to comparative work for individuals seeking genetic confirmation or variation analysis.
Re: Ball Python DNA mapping
im not exactly sure what you are looking for us to say?
of course it would be awesome for someone to map the ball python genome. since you already apparently have a means to get dna into digital form, you already have one obstacle out of the way. some questions I would ask are how long does it even take to get one snakes dna into a database. just a quick look around on google is showing me humans take about 3 days. With that in mind how many normal snakes are you going to have to test before you can compare them to morphs to see where these alleles sit? I mean are we looking at a possible multi year project before you have the data you need?
It wouldn't be only testing hets, you could also end the lesser/butter debate and the cinny/black pastel debate, see what other morphs are actually the same, see what morphs lay on the same locus. Theres a lot we could get from this, but as you see above there concerns of money and also time.
Re: Ball Python DNA mapping
Quote:
Originally Posted by
OhhWatALoser
im not exactly sure what you are looking for us to say?
of course it would be awesome for someone to map the ball python genome. since you already apparently have a means to get dna into digital form, you already have one obstacle out of the way. some questions I would ask are how long does it even take to get one snakes dna into a database. just a quick look around on google is showing me humans take about 3 days. With that in mind how many normal snakes are you going to have to test before you can compare them to morphs to see where these alleles sit? I mean are we looking at a possible multi year project before you have the data you need?
It wouldn't be only testing hets, you could also end the lesser/butter debate and the cinny/black pastel debate, see what other morphs are actually the same, see what morphs lay on the same locus. Theres a lot we could get from this, but as you see above there concerns of money and also time.
Is this a appealing service for you? Why? Why not? What else would you want out of it?
I am working on targeting a specific section of DNA, not mapping the entire genome. By targeting a specific sections, a benchmark will be generated and can be used for comparison.
I am still working on setting up trials to determine turnaround time. There are a lot of factors that influence turnaround time including, sample type (swab or blood), DNA concentration for PCR (DNA replication) and then the actual protocol for running the sample. I am estimating that given basic constraints turnaround would be 1-2 days for digital results and 7-10 days for prints. With that being said, this is still only speculative until trials have been run and the protocol has been optimized.
Re: Ball Python DNA mapping
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BPSP
Is this a appealing service for you? Why? Why not? What else would you want out of it?
I am working on targeting a specific section of DNA, not mapping the entire genome. By targeting a specific sections, a benchmark will be generated and can be used for comparison.
I am still working on setting up trials to determine turnaround time. There are a lot of factors that influence turnaround time including, sample type (swab or blood), DNA concentration for PCR (DNA replication) and then the actual protocol for running the sample. I am estimating that given basic constraints turnaround would be 1-2 days for digital results and 7-10 days for prints. With that being said, this is still only speculative until trials have been run and the protocol has been optimized.
i obviously have no idea how any of this works, but how exactly can you target a section and know that is where you should be looking.
Re: Ball Python DNA mapping
Quote:
Originally Posted by
OhhWatALoser
i obviously have no idea how any of this works, but how exactly can you target a section and know that is where you should be looking.
Well the short answer is Sanger Sequencing.
I will have to identify which chain terminating variant is best for comparison purposes through accumulation and analysis. Once a sample is amplified using PCR then all 4 chain terminating variants will be introduced and then the results will be run through electrophoresis and the sequence will be deduced from there.
From that point on the same chain terminating variant can be introduced and then compared to the same section in the catalog to confirm a relationship between samples.