Re: Question about Paradoxes
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kinra
I know the paradox aspect isn't genetic. I was just wondering if anyone could back up Jim's statement. I don't know how much Jim has invested in testing this, but I hadn't really considered before that a paradox albino could just be a really cool looking het albino.
Yes it's been proven that some of the paradox's have been really cool looking het's.
Re: Question about Paradoxes
Here's a question.. Has a paradox been bred to a paradox? I've strayed from this topic because like hybrids, it seems to be touchy...
There are "birth" marks on quite a few different animals, including humans...IMO that's all it is, is a birth mark. BUT...TBH, I don't think we'll ever really know unless a paradox proves out..which COULD be possible, though I personally think it isn't.
Re: Question about Paradoxes
I have dissected some snakes. As far as I could tell, each testis connected to only one hemipenis.
In a chimera, both testes could belong to only one member of the chimera, one testis could belong to one and the other testis to the other, or there could be a mixture in one or both testes. So a chimera could be proven homozygous albino or heterozygous albino by breeding test. Or even normal if one member of a paradox albino chimera was genotypically homozygous normal.
Recently I happened across some material on double yolked eggs in pigeons. They seem more likely to be produced in large, well-fed birds. Birds of smaller breeds and less well-fed birds of all breeds seem less likely to produce double yolked eggs. A chimera would hatch from a double yolked egg. And royal pythons in captivity are generally fatter than their wild cousins.
Re: Question about Paradoxes
Thanks, I had wondered if since they had two hemipenes if each connected directly to it’s own testis. I had to actually look up if they had two testis or ovaries and found an interesting thing that the right one is supposed to always be closer to the head than the left.
To take the chimera theory a step further (and as far as I know it's just an unproven theory of what MIGHT be going on with the paradox animals), what about the 50% of the time where the siblings would be different genders? Any reason those babies couldn't be expected to hatch? Suppose it would depend on the particulars of who got what parts if they could reproduce as either sex.