Is he a fake?

I found this on facebook while doing some surfing...

https://www.facebook.com/profile.php...type=3&theater

Guy claims that was his panda pied and that he sold it. I've only heard of Outback producing the Panda Pied. Is this really his or is he bsing?

It looks like the original panda, actually. And it's an old picture, because she's got an eyepatch now.

I think he got the panda from outback. There was some trading/switching going on after it was produced.

If what he means by "I sold it that same day!" means he bought it and sold it all in one day.. that's quite a flip! :P

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Misfit

If what he means by "I sold it that same day!" means he bought it and sold it all in one day.. that's quite a flip! :P

---

I was wondering the same thing!

I don't think it was considered "flipped." Just not sure on where to take this snake in the future, iirc.

He doesn't say he made it.

The album is called "Why I'm always broke" which would imply he BOUGHT it(therefor was broke) and his comment of "sold it same day" says he resold it(flipped it).

I believe Micheal Cole produced the first Panda Pied, didn't he?

Outback reptiles produced it first, and then they sold it. I don't think the album title implies that he bought and sold the same day. I took it to mean he had it for sale and it sold that day that he had it for sale. Not saying he didn't flip, but sometimes we are a little too quick to jump to conclusions. I don't know of any controversy involving the panda transactions, so I don't know why we are creating any.

What controversy? If he bought it, sold it, kept it... none of that is controversal.

True, he could have meant that he put it up for sale and sold it on the same day.

The picture just looks like the labels on BallRoomPythonsSouth tables. Lots of people use those labels though.

I meant controversy over flipping.

Either way, those labels ARE widely used. And this is the original panda, but I doubt it was being flipped.