Something that has confused me for a while...
I'm starting to take a liking to the more high end morphs (phantom, mocha, mystic, freak, special, etc.). While looking though I have noticed one thing that confuses me. We all know about hets, blah blah blah. What I don't understand is there are het red axanthic and het pumas.....yet I can't find that there is a puma or red axanthic. Correct me if I'm wrong please. But I don't understand how something can be a het when it doesn't produce the real thing?
Thanks
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using Tapatalk
Re: Something that has confused me for a while...
that puma's freakin insane
Re: Something that has confused me for a while...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Jessica Loesch
They ARE hets, genetically. They are codom hets, or heterozygous for a codominant gene. They are not recessive hets, as we normally think of.
^This^ Another example could be a lesser being called a het BEL