Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 643

0 members and 643 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,909
Threads: 249,113
Posts: 2,572,172
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, KoreyBuchanan
  • 10-18-2011, 06:49 PM
    kevinb
    Something that has confused me for a while...
    I'm starting to take a liking to the more high end morphs (phantom, mocha, mystic, freak, special, etc.). While looking though I have noticed one thing that confuses me. We all know about hets, blah blah blah. What I don't understand is there are het red axanthic and het pumas.....yet I can't find that there is a puma or red axanthic. Correct me if I'm wrong please. But I don't understand how something can be a het when it doesn't produce the real thing?

    Thanks

    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using Tapatalk
  • 10-18-2011, 06:57 PM
    rexrem
    There is a puma http://www.worldofballpythons.com/morphs/puma/
    and a het red axanthic http://www.coreywoods.com/het.shtml
    red axanthic http://www.coreywoods.com/red.shtml
    From what I understand, the het red axanthics are co-doms where the red axanthic is its super form.
  • 10-18-2011, 07:00 PM
    Kinra
    Some snakes are just named werid, like how some will call yellow bellies het Ivories. I believe there is a Red Axanthic morph. The puma is a little more complicated. I believe het pumas are one of those morphs that you breed to a yellow belly and get something cool out of. :P

    http://www.worldofballpythons.com/morphs/puma/
  • 10-18-2011, 07:14 PM
    kevinb
    Oh okay. I stand corrected. Its just odd since they aren't really hets.

    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using Tapatalk
  • 10-18-2011, 07:18 PM
    pingure
    sorry for the :hijackd:
    What else mixes with the yellow bellies like that?
    sorry again never heard of that and very curios.
  • 10-18-2011, 07:25 PM
    cmack91
    Re: Something that has confused me for a while...
    that puma's freakin insane
  • 10-18-2011, 07:25 PM
    Jessica Loesch
    They ARE hets, genetically. They are codom hets, or heterozygous for a codominant gene. They are not recessive hets, as we normally think of.
  • 10-18-2011, 08:13 PM
    kevinb
    True. They can be called hets, In the codom sense. Its just odd to see it that way.

    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using Tapatalk
  • 10-18-2011, 11:31 PM
    Jonas@Balls2TheWall
    Re: Something that has confused me for a while...
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Jessica Loesch View Post
    They ARE hets, genetically. They are codom hets, or heterozygous for a codominant gene. They are not recessive hets, as we normally think of.

    ^This^ Another example could be a lesser being called a het BEL
  • 10-19-2011, 09:49 AM
    Slashmaster
    So is that het-pumas are a complementary gene to the YB gene, thus creating that gorgeous animal? Sort of like how lesser + mojave are complementary genes.. or on the same locus, at least.

    If you breed a puma to a normal do you get all YB and het puma?
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1