Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 1,232

3 members and 1,229 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,934
Threads: 249,129
Posts: 2,572,283
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, LavadaCanc

I'm Confused

Printable View

  • 09-01-2011, 07:42 PM
    thedarkwolf25
    I'm Confused
    I know a little bit about morphs and the genetics involved in them, but I was cruising Craigslist and I noticed someone selling a Het Red Axanthic BP. He mentions that Red Axanthic is a Co-Dom.

    How can that be? Axanthism is a recessive trait (hence the het) how then can it be a Co-Dom?

    The way I understand it is that with recessive traits an animal must possess both Alleles for the gene to express itself, an animal that does this is called Homozygous. If an animal only posses ONE of the pair then it is called Heterozygous (het).

    An animal that posses a Dominant trait (such as spider) only needs ONE of the Alleles of the gene for it to express. And a Co-Dominant trait (such as a pastel) has a Super form. This means that the Dominant form only requires ONE of the Alleles for it to express, however if an animal has BOTH Alleles then the Super form (Super Pastel) is expressed.

    Does that sound right? So how then can a recessive trait be a Co-Dom? :confused: :confused:
  • 09-01-2011, 08:05 PM
    Stewart_Reptiles
    Het Red Axanthic http://www.coreywoods.com/het.shtml is indeed a Co-dom and it's super form is the Red Axanthic http://www.coreywoods.com/red.shtml which is not to be mistaken with the axanthic (recessive) http://www.worldofballpythons.com/morphs/axanthic/

    The Het red Axanthic is a visual het.
  • 09-01-2011, 08:06 PM
    John1982
    Heterozygous can be used to describe recessive and co-dominate states, just in co-dom the het is visual so isn't usually stated. Homozygous is visual in both recessive and co-dom.
  • 09-01-2011, 08:07 PM
    Ash
    Re: I'm Confused
    Because the red axanthic gene and the regular axanthic gene aren't related. The black-and-white looking one is recessive. Het red axanthic is something completely different and is codominant. It'd be kind of like somebody calling a lesser a het BEL.

    It's just a misleading name. For example, the original name for a pastel ball python was pastel jungle. Later on, somebody started calling ball pythons with busy patterns 'jungle' ball pythons. It got really confusing because people were never sure if a 'pastel jungle' was a combination of both genes or just a plain pastel. Some names are annoying like that.

    You have your genetics absolutely right :-)
  • 09-01-2011, 09:18 PM
    thedarkwolf25
    Ahhhh ok. I was thinking that the Red was related to the normal axanthic. Thanks for clearing that up.

    Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1