Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 761

2 members and 759 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,905
Threads: 249,107
Posts: 2,572,121
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Pattyhud

Bel

Printable View

  • 08-05-2011, 01:46 PM
    Tidus10
    Bel
    So if you can get a BEL from lesser X mojo.. Then if you breed a BEL that was made by lesser X lesser to a lesser would you still get mojos?
  • 08-05-2011, 01:50 PM
    purplemuffin
    Actually, you'd just get BELs all around I think.

    lesserxlessers and lesserxmojos!
  • 08-05-2011, 01:52 PM
    tcutting
    no. there is no mojo present in that combo.

    Mojave is its own color morph that is extremely close to lessers. hence when you cross the two you get BEL. Also 2 mojaves can make BEL and so can 2 Lessers. The BEL is the "super" form of the morphs. and BEL that was made strictly with Lessers can not make a mojave unless the other mate had the mojave gene. which would make BELs and lessers.

    and a BEL (lesser super) x lesser would make BELs and lessers
  • 08-05-2011, 01:58 PM
    Alexandra V
    No, you wouldn't. Mojave and lesser are two different morphs, but when the genes are together in the same snake, they act together in a similar way to a snake that has 2 lesser genes or 2 mojave genes.

    Say you paired a Mojave x Lesser,
    in theory the odds would be like this:
    1/4 babies normal
    1/4 babies Mojave
    1/4 babies Lesser
    1/4 babies BEL

    Now you take that BEL and you pair it to a normal, you'd get:
    1/2 babies Lesser
    1/2 babies Mojave

    Mojave x Lesser makes a similar looking snake to Lesser x Lesser, but it still contains the two different morphs.
  • 08-05-2011, 02:01 PM
    Tidus10
    That's kinda odd/interesting.. Thanks for the collective knowledge folks :)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1