Re: Please prove me right?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Superdan
Hey guys,
Ive just found out that my normal female was sexed wrong at the pet shop and so now I have a male! lol Ive looked at the other genetics thread but just wanted to comfirm my understanding. Do I only need a morph female to get a chance of a morph cluth or a super? can anyone help?
Cheers
If he is a normal he will only produce normals unless he is heterozygous for a particular morph which is unlikely unless you purchased him as a het. Even then you would need to breed him to another het for the same gene. There are co-dominant genes, dominant genes, and recessives. Co-dom and dominant genes are usually visable to the snake so you will know if you have one and recessives need 2 of a gene to produce a visable morph, so both the male and female must have the gene and they need to match up (look up punnet squares). Also you can only make supers if you breed co-dom genes together. So if you want morphs you will have to buy morphs. I think this is what you are asking. hope it helps. There are exceptions with certain morphs and appearances but in general this is the idea. Also you can have a morph male or female and make morphs, not just female.
Re: Please prove me right?
Sex has nothing to do with the outcomes when it comes to breeding, the only difference is that a male can obviously breed several females.
Normal x Single Gene Morph (Do or Co-Dom) = 50% Single Gene Morph (Do or Co-Dom) + 50% Normals (chances per eggs)
Normal X Super = 100% Single Gene Morph (Do or Co-Dom)
In both case it does not matter if the normal is a male, strategically though I would not waste a female morph by breeding her to a normal male.
Now the thing is if you bought an animal and it was mis-sexed you should be entitle to get what you really bought or be offered a refund even for a normal. :gj:
Re: Please prove me right?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Deborah
Now the thing is if you bought an animal and it was mis-sexed you should be entitle to get what you really bought or be offered a refund even for a normal. :gj:
Thanks i know but got him for his pattern not the sex, female would have been nice but there was no difference in price! I grown a bond with him now!
Guess i'l just have to start a collection... :D:D:D
Re: Please prove me right?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Superdan
Thanks i know but got him for his pattern not the sex, female would have been nice but there was no difference in price! I grown a bond with him now!
Guess i'l just have to start a collection... :D:D:D
Normals have many different patterns and color variants but they will not produce morphs. If your going to start a collection be sure you know what your getting into and what snakes your getting. Good luck.
Re: Please prove me right?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Domepiece
If he is a normal he will only produce normals unless he is heterozygous for a particular morph which is unlikely unless you purchased him as a het. Even then you would need to breed him to another het for the same gene. There are co-dominant genes, dominant genes, and recessives. Co-dom and dominant genes are usually visable to the snake so you will know if you have one and recessives need 2 of a gene to produce a visable morph, so both the male and female must have the gene and they need to match up (look up punnet squares). Also you can only make supers if you breed co-dom genes together. So if you want morphs you will have to buy morphs. I think this is what you are asking. hope it helps. There are exceptions with certain morphs and appearances but in general this is the idea. Also you can have a morph male or female and make morphs, not just female.
Half right.. Half Wrong..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Domepiece
Normals have many different patterns and color variants but they will not produce morphs. If your going to start a collection be sure you know what your getting into and what snakes your getting. Good luck.
WRONG!
Re: Please prove me right?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Lukestimp
Half right.. Half Wrong..
WRONG!
Lets back this train up here a little bit. Explain yourself. How is this wrong? Are you saying that normals dont have different colors of brown(light to dark) and dont have different "normal patterns" on them? Some normals may have unique patterns and colors but are still normals unless proven otherwise. Dont criticize peoples posts unless you intend on making a contribution to them, not just writing "WRONG".