Check my logic with this BEL question...
Okay, I've been wracking my brain on this for a couple of days.....let's say I take a BEL male that was produced from a LesserxMojave, and breed it with a Lesser female. What would the possible outcomes be (percentages)?
BEL (LesserxLesser)
BEL (LesserxMojave)
Lesser
Mojave
Normal
Thanks very much for your help!
Re: Check my logic with this BEL question...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FragginDragon
Okay, I've been wracking my brain on this for a couple of days.....let's say I take a BEL male that was produced from a LesserxMojave, and breed it with a Lesser female. What would the possible outcomes be (percentages)?
BEL (LesserxLesser)
BEL (LesserxMojave)
Lesser
Mojave
Normal
Thanks very much for your help!
12.5%: Normal
25%: Lesser Platinum
12.5%: Super Lesser
12.5%: Mojave
25%: Mojave, Lesser Platinum
12.5%: Super Lesser, Mojave
Re: Check my logic with this BEL question...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FragginDragon
Okay, I've been wracking my brain on this for a couple of days.....let's say I take a BEL male that was produced from a LesserxMojave, and breed it with a Lesser female. What would the possible outcomes be (percentages)?
BEL (LesserxLesser)
BEL (LesserxMojave)
Lesser
Mojave
Normal
Thanks very much for your help!
50% BEL
25% Lesser
25% Mojave..
No normals
Re: Check my logic with this BEL question...
I believe it would be:
25% BEL (super lesser)
25% BEL (lesser mojo)
25% Lesser
25% Mojo
This is from a Punnet square I just made. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
Re: Check my logic with this BEL question...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Agent73
I believe it would be:
25% BEL (super lesser)
25% BEL (lesser mojo)
25% Lesser
25% Mojo
This is from a Punnet square I just made. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
this is correct
Re: Check my logic with this BEL question...
see now im way lost, i guess i can understand there being no normals (i dont but ill play along LOL) but why wouldnt there be a super lesser mojo in the mix?
Re: Check my logic with this BEL question...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
771subliminal
12.5%: Normal
25%: Lesser Platinum
12.5%: Super Lesser
12.5%: Mojave
25%: Mojave, Lesser Platinum
12.5%: Super Lesser, Mojave
I know this what the genetic wizard is saying but is this right? Seems wrong to me that the chance for a normal is there, goes against what my Punnet square says. Also super lesser mojo from that pairing? really?
Re: Check my logic with this BEL question...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
771subliminal
see now im way lost, i guess i can understand there being no normals (i dont but ill play along LOL) but why wouldnt there be a super lesser mojo in the mix?
Because the Mojo Lesser BEL is a homozygous animal and not a combo like a bee..
Re: Check my logic with this BEL question...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
771subliminal
see now im way lost, i guess i can understand there being no normals (i dont but ill play along LOL) but why wouldnt there be a super lesser mojo in the mix?
Becuase the dad has 2 codom genes. So all the kids would get at least 1 of those. All would get either the lesser or mojo gene and there would be no normals, right?
Also there couldn't be a super lesser mojo becuase the kids would get either the lesser or mojo from the dad, not both right?
Re: Check my logic with this BEL question...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Agent73
Becuase the dad has 2 codom genes. So all the kids would get at least 1 of those. All would get either the lesser or mojo gene and there would be no normals, right?
Also there couldn't be a super lesser mojo becuase the kids would get either the lesser or mojo from the dad, not both right?
ok then explain how bee x pastel = killerbee? wouldnt this pairing fall under the same rules?