Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 763

0 members and 763 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,908
Threads: 249,107
Posts: 2,572,126
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, KoreyBuchanan

CBO on S373

Printable View

  • 01-23-2010, 11:10 PM
    snakemastercanada
    CBO on S373
    CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE
    COST ESTIMATE
    January 21, 2010
    S. 373
    A bill to amend title 18, United States Code, to include constrictor
    snakes of the species Python genera as an injurious animal
    As ordered reported by the Senate Committee on the Environment and Public Works
    on December 10, 2009
    CBO estimates that implementing S. 373 would have no significant cost to the federal
    government. Enacting the bill could affect direct spending and revenues, but CBO
    estimates that any such effects would not be significant.
    S. 373 would make it a federal crime to import or ship certain snakes into the United
    States. Because the bill would establish a new offense, the government would be able to
    pursue cases that it otherwise would not be able to prosecute. We expect that S. 373
    would apply to a relatively small number of offenders, so any increase in costs for law
    enforcement, court proceedings, or prison operations would not be significant. Any such
    costs would be subject to the availability of appropriated funds.
    Because those prosecuted and convicted under S. 373 could be subject to criminal fines,
    the federal government might collect additional fines if the legislation is enacted.
    Criminal fines are recorded as revenues, deposited in the Crime Victims Fund, and later
    spent. CBO expects that any additional revenues and direct spending would not be
    significant because of the small number of cases likely to be affected.
    Under S. 373, entities such as zoos would need permits to import or transport the affected
    species of snakes. Based on information provided by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
    (USFWS), which issues permits for such activities, CBO estimates that enacting the bill
    could result in an increase in offsetting collections (for permits) and associated spending.
    We estimate that such increases would be minimal, however, and would offset each other
    in most years, resulting in no significant net cost.
    By prohibiting the importation and interstate transport of several species of python,
    anaconda, and boa constrictor without a permit from USFWS, the bill would impose
    intergovernmental and private-sector mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates
    Reform Act (UMRA). USFWS is authorized to issue permits for scientific, medical,
    educational, or zoological reasons.
    2
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1