Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 817

1 members and 816 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,905
Threads: 249,102
Posts: 2,572,091
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Pattyhud
  • 09-16-2009, 03:15 AM
    omnibus2
    Normal Males useless for breeding?
    I was reading somewhere that a male normal would be rather useless for breeding, unless you plan to have a collection of normals; is there any particular reason, why a normal male is more useless than a normal female? Thanks for clearing this up.
  • 09-16-2009, 03:21 AM
    Beto510
    Re: Normal Males useless for breeding?
    HOLD ON WTF is that a blue pie-bald in ur pic?!
  • 09-16-2009, 03:26 AM
    rthamilton
    Re: Normal Males useless for breeding?
    I would say that morph males are cheaper than morph females and thats probally why its like that. I actually own 2 normal males(one which i now seem to share). But to be honest I have them because i like their patterns, In my opinion a good looking snake is a good looking snake whether its a normal or anything else. But in the business world its alot cheaper to mix a male morph(which is cheaper)x normal female and get the same result as male(normal) x female morph(more expensive)
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by omnibus2 View Post
    I was reading somewhere that a male normal would be rather useless for breeding, unless you plan to have a collection of normals; is there any particular reason, why a normal male is more useless than a normal female? Thanks for clearing this up.

  • 09-16-2009, 03:27 AM
    rthamilton
    Re: Normal Males useless for breeding?
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Beto510 View Post
    HOLD ON WTF is that a blue pie-bald in ur pic?!

    Doesnt everyone have one of those in their collection?
  • 09-16-2009, 03:34 AM
    WingedWolfPsion
    Re: Normal Males useless for breeding?
    Males are less expensive than females--you can purchase a morph male for perhaps $75 these days. In a pet store, normal balls cost $60 or even more in some cases.

    One male can fertilize up to 3 females in his first year of breeding, and even more as he reaches his full size. Males breed around age 1. Females need 3 years to grow to adult size.

    Because of all these factors, adult females are quite valuable. You can place one morph male with a half a dozen normal females, and get around 18 morphs in your clutches. So, the perception is that placing a normal male with morph females would be a huge waste--you could have gotten a morph male for very little more money, and gotten back a huge return on the investment, as opposed to the much smaller return from using a normal male. It seems a waste of potential income to use a normal male with a morph female. She can only be paired once each year. The male can be paired with many females.
  • 09-16-2009, 04:01 AM
    omnibus2
    Re: Normal Males useless for breeding?
    Ah, now I see, why you should get female normals and male morphs. Thanks everyone.

    @Beto510

    Yes I just bred my first blue piebald, but it's not for sale right now. :P
  • 09-16-2009, 12:12 PM
    Beto510
    Re: Normal Males useless for breeding?
    If that was a real morph i would HAVE to
    have it
  • 09-16-2009, 12:16 PM
    DesignerBP
    Re: Normal Males useless for breeding?
    if a new morph from the wild needs to be proven and happens to be a female then i could see another use of a normal male.
  • 09-16-2009, 01:28 PM
    reixox
    Re: Normal Males useless for breeding?
    you would totally have to name the morph Blueberry Pie.
    Lol
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1