Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 2,157

0 members and 2,157 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,191, 03-09-2025 at 12:17 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,870
Threads: 249,065
Posts: 2,571,956
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, EMJAY
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    BPnet Veteran Montessa Python's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-11-2008
    Posts
    417
    Thanks
    124
    Thanked 55 Times in 47 Posts
    Images: 1

    Wink Why are Mojave/YB so cheap but BEL's aren't?

    Can some one explain why you can usually get a mojave for 150 to 300 dollars, and YB equally or lesser priced. But an Ivory or BEL is so much more expensive..
    When you can simply breed 450 dollars worth of snakes and get a BEL or Ivory in a snap...
    And why are people still breeding Mojaves to normals when they could be breeding for BEL's?
    IF the BEL is so much more expensive, shouldn't the creating morph be a bit more pricey?
    A het lavender albino is worth its weight in gold or platinum...and since a mojave is somewhat het for BEL... shouldn't they be more pricey??LOL
    I realize there is a percentage chance of no BEL's per breeding...
    But why are the parents so cheap and the offspring if BEL or other such as the Ivory, super cinny.. so expensive??

    Just wondering
    Carol

  2. #2
    BPnet Veteran Jyson's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-07-2008
    Location
    Brooksville, FL
    Posts
    2,615
    Thanks
    1,487
    Thanked 577 Times in 518 Posts
    Images: 9

    Re: Why are Mojave/YB so cheap but BEL's aren't?

    Quote Originally Posted by Montessa Python View Post
    Can some one explain why you can usually get a mojave for 150 to 300 dollars, and YB equally or lesser priced. But an Ivory or BEL is so much more expensive..
    When you can simply breed 450 dollars worth of snakes and get a BEL or Ivory in a snap...
    And why are people still breeding Mojaves to normals when they could be breeding for BEL's?
    IF the BEL is so much more expensive, shouldn't the creating morph be a bit more pricey?
    A het lavender albino is worth its weight in gold or platinum...and since a mojave is somewhat het for BEL... shouldn't they be more pricey??LOL
    I realize there is a percentage chance of no BEL's per breeding...
    But why are the parents so cheap and the offspring if BEL or other such as the Ivory, super cinny.. so expensive??

    Just wondering
    Carol
    I think you just kinda answered your original question with another question But yeah, I think the reason why Bels are still so expensive is because people continue to breed mojos, ybs and lessers to normals or some other morphs, thus producing more mojos, ybs, and/or lessers, which is probably the reason why lessers, yb, and mojos, etc. have gone down in price and their supers haven't.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Jyson For This Useful Post:

    Montessa Python (06-21-2009)

  4. #3
    Royal Morphz Maker Royal Morphz's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-20-2008
    Location
    West Covina,CA
    Posts
    2,674
    Thanks
    1,734
    Thanked 622 Times in 470 Posts
    Images: 5

    Re: Why are Mojave/YB so cheap but BEL's aren't?

    I just picked up a mojo breeder for 350 shipped and a great deal as the guy started his price at 550+ shipping but for the same mojo female ready to breed your looking at 1200-1500 and people just arent paying that so they would normally just breed that male to normals until they can afford the female or pic up a female BEL and then raise her up for 3 years
    Tim Johnson

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Royal Morphz For This Useful Post:

    Montessa Python (06-21-2009)

  6. #4
    BPnet Senior Member waltah!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    10-08-2007
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    5,648
    Thanks
    1,483
    Thanked 1,252 Times in 931 Posts
    Images: 8

    Re: Why are Mojave/YB so cheap but BEL's aren't?

    I think Tim hit it right on the nose. Think about pricing on adult breeder pairs vs. hatchling pricing. Everyone is always talking about buying Pastel males for $100, but a female breeder may run over 1k. As Tim said, it takes years to raise up those babies. I also wouldn't say that you can get a BEL or Ivory in a "snap". It could take 2-3 breeding seasons to make that super. Also, the comparison to the Het Lav is not quite a fair one. When you are talking recessive traits, you can add a few more years to the time it can take to prove out.
    --Walt

  7. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to waltah! For This Useful Post:

    Montessa Python (06-21-2009),Royal Morphz (06-20-2009)

  8. #5
    BPnet Veteran Jason Bowden's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-28-2009
    Location
    Broussard, LA
    Posts
    2,081
    Thanks
    1,156
    Thanked 576 Times in 550 Posts

    Re: Why are Mojave/YB so cheap but BEL's aren't?

    Just because they are supers. Have you priced a super pastel lately? They are about four times more expensive than a pastel.
    Mojo-$300 ---- $300x4 = $1200 Plus some extra dinero because BELs are the bomb.
    The supers are also real "powerful" in the breeding arena!

  9. #6
    BPnet Veteran Jason Bowden's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-28-2009
    Location
    Broussard, LA
    Posts
    2,081
    Thanks
    1,156
    Thanked 576 Times in 550 Posts

    Re: Why are Mojave/YB so cheap but BEL's aren't?

    I agree with the others that have posted in that codominant prices can't be compared to recessive pricing. Different ball game all together.

  10. #7
    Apprentice SPAM Janitor MarkS's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-22-2005
    Location
    St Paul, MN
    Posts
    6,209
    Thanks
    1,535
    Thanked 2,678 Times in 1,596 Posts
    Blog Entries
    9
    Images: 3

    Re: Why are Mojave/YB so cheap but BEL's aren't?

    It's not an automatic thing to get the morph you want just by breeding the parents. To get a Leucistic from breeding two Mojaves together you only have a 25% chance for each egg and before you can even try you have to spend an average of 3 years to get them to breeding size. Six years ago I bought a pair of het hypos. Their first year breeding I produced 2.2 66% possible het hypos. The second year breeding I only got three eggs and produced 1.1 66% het hypos and a baby hypo that was dead in the shell at hatching. This year, it appears that they're going to take the year off. Maybe I'll finally produce one next year, but by then I'm sure the cost to buy a hypo will be cheaper then I originally paid for my het pair.
    Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus

  11. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MarkS For This Useful Post:

    Montessa Python (06-21-2009),Royal Morphz (06-20-2009)

  12. #8
    BPnet Lifer wolfy-hound's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-10-2005
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    5,505
    Thanks
    2,128
    Thanked 2,221 Times in 1,151 Posts
    Images: 23

    Re: Why are Mojave/YB so cheap but BEL's aren't?

    What Mark said.

    Also, the potential is much greater with the supers. A luecistic will produce all mojaves(or all YB or lessers, depending on what made the Luecistic), no matter what you breed it to. That makes a super more pricey, AND makes the original morph more common, thus less pricey.

    Female supers are even MORE pricey, because of thier potential. And like mentioned... breeding a pair of hets, or a pair of co-doms doesn't automatically gain you the super(or homo) form of the morph. You can miss a lot, but still make the co-doms(again making them more common, and less pricey).
    Theresa Baker
    No Legs and More
    Florida, USA
    "Stop being a wimpy monkey,; bare some teeth, steal some food and fling poo with the alphas. "

  13. #9
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    09-14-2007
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    3,250
    Thanks
    170
    Thanked 703 Times in 538 Posts

    Re: Why are Mojave/YB so cheap but BEL's aren't?

    For simplicity sake, I'm just going to talk about mojaves and BELs, but the same applies to YBs and ivories.

    1) - Supply - there just aren't as many BELs out there as there is mojaves. For every BEL produced from mojave x mojave breeding, there are roughly 2 mojaves. And that doesn't even count all the mojave x normal or mojave x other morphs breedings that are done. The supply of mojaves is huge compared to BELs. If you have any doubt about that, go to KS and count how many mojaves are for sale. Now go back and count how many BELs.

    2) - Demand - BELs are more desirable both to those who plan on breeding them, and those who just want a cool looking snake.

    3) - Cost of the "raw materials" - a breeder could produce mojaves this year by purchasing a male mojave and a 1000 g or so normal female last year. I'm not sure exactly what they were going for last year, but maybe roughly $500 for the pair? To be able to produce BELs this year, a breeder either bought a female mojave 3 years ago and raised her up, or bought a 1000g or so female mojave last year. Way more than $500, and that doesn't even count the male yet.

    Finally, you don't produce any sort of BP "in a snap". Or at least you can't count on it. To get the prices you mentioned, you'd be buying hatchlings and raising the female up for 3 years. Even if you spend more to get a breeding size female, there is no guarantee she'll breed for you, and if she does, there is no guarantee you'll get the particular morph in question.
    Casey

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to kc261 For This Useful Post:

    Montessa Python (06-21-2009)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1