» Site Navigation
0 members and 1,565 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,191, 03-09-2025 at 12:17 PM.
» Today's Birthdays
» Stats
Members: 75,870
Threads: 249,064
Posts: 2,571,954
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, EMJAY
|
-
Registered User
petsmart on HR 669
http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix....65&p=factset17
PetSmart – The Facts
PetSmart - The Facts
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nonnative Wildlife Invasion Prevention Act (HR 669)
PetSmart, our friends in the pet specialty industry and pet parents are watching closely a proposed new regulation beginning to inch its way through Congress. The Nonnative Wildlife Invasion Prevention Act (HR 669) proposes an unreasonably complicated and ineffective process to determine which non-native species can be in the country and which ones can't, including species (many enjoyed as pets) that already are well established in the U.S.
The bill creates severe restrictions that could adversely impact the importation, breeding, sale, or interstate transport of common household pets such as gerbils, hamsters, guinea pigs, fish, and various birds, reptiles and amphibians in the U.S. A coalition of animal rights groups that includes the Humane Society of the U.S. is pushing for the bill's passage without amendments.
While PetSmart agrees with and supports the underlying premise of the proposed regulation - to keep harmful non-native species out of the country - we oppose the proposed legislation on several grounds. More specifically:
We support a process that more fully takes into account the risks associated with various species based on sound scientific data.
We believe the current drafting of the bill does not take into account existing protective measures, the impact to pet parents and the economic impact on the pet specialty industry. It also requires funds and staffing not currently available to the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, which would be tasked with administrating and enforcing the regulation. Moreover, it could lead to the mass release and/or euthanasia of pets.
We believe a more practical and meaningful regulatory process could be developed and implemented in a timely manner. Along with our industry partners we've offered our expertise to help craft legislation that is more reasonable and still achieves the desired intent.
We believe the small pets, reptiles, fish, birds and amphibians we sell currently meet the intent of the bill and do not create any of the risks outlined in the proposed legislation, yet virtually all of them would be in jeopardy under the bill as currently drafted.
A hearing on the bill is scheduled April 23 in the House Subcommittee on Insular Affairs, Oceans & Wildlife. PetSmart will be represented at the hearing by the Pet Industry Joint Advisory Committee, a pet industry trade organization of which we are a member.
We will continue to advocate for a more effective approach to regulating harmful non-native species.
-
-
Re: petsmart on HR 669
I hope they have flyers at their stores, to inform their customers who may not be aware of it.
Check out what's available at
"The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated." - Gandhi
-
-
Re: petsmart on HR 669
Finally in the home stretch, Petsmart wakes up!
Hopefully they are having their employees go send emails and letters too!
Theresa Baker
No Legs and More
Florida, USA
"Stop being a wimpy monkey,; bare some teeth, steal some food and fling poo with the alphas. "
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|