Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 625

2 members and 623 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,912
Threads: 249,115
Posts: 2,572,187
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, coda
Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    BPnet Veteran nevohraalnavnoj's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-04-2007
    Location
    Norfolk, Virginia
    Posts
    1,098
    Thanks
    57
    Thanked 102 Times in 69 Posts
    Images: 1

    Pos-het question

    Hi everyone, I saw an interesting ad on KS today.

    This person crossed a 100% het clown with a 50% pos-het clown and is listing the babies as 66% pos-het clown.

    Now, I thought you got 66% pos-hets from 100% het x 100% het.

    It seems like you would have to do two separate punnet squares for this. One where the 50% pos-het is actually a het, here you get the 66% babies. In the other punnet square you would have to do where the 50% pos-het is NOT a het, here you get 50% babies. Now you would have to average those two results, and get 56.5% or something??

    Can someone please clarify???

    Thanks!

    JonV

  2. #2
    Old enough to remember. Freakie_frog's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-12-2004
    Location
    221b Baker Street
    Posts
    16,636
    Thanks
    462
    Thanked 3,884 Times in 2,148 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    Images: 107

    Re: Pos-het question

    The olny way they are 66% het is if he proved the poss het that then makes it a 100% het and the normal off spring then are 66%.

    When you've got 10,000 people trying to do the same thing, why would you want to be number 10,001? ~ Mark Cuban
    "for the discerning collector"



  3. #3
    BPnet Veteran nevohraalnavnoj's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-04-2007
    Location
    Norfolk, Virginia
    Posts
    1,098
    Thanks
    57
    Thanked 102 Times in 69 Posts
    Images: 1

    Re: Pos-het question

    Okay, sorry for posting! I re-read the ad and it turns out they did produce a clown from this pairing, meaning the het was actually a het. So these are 66% babies.

    I was thrown off because they still referred to the, now actual het, as a pos-het.

    JonV

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1