Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 2,392

0 members and 2,392 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,191, 03-09-2025 at 12:17 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,895
Threads: 249,089
Posts: 2,572,053
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, TwoToedSloth
Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    BPnet Veteran Patrick Long's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-16-2005
    Location
    Ventura, California, United States
    Posts
    8,209
    Thanks
    564
    Thanked 987 Times in 736 Posts
    Images: 36

    Hairless X Haired

    Would the babies be hairless, both, blotched?

  2. #2
    BPnet Veteran littleindiangirl's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-31-2007
    Posts
    8,193
    Thanks
    637
    Thanked 794 Times in 487 Posts
    Images: 25

    Re: Hairless X Haired

    I thought hairless was recessive....
    Yea, a hairless x coated will give you coated het for hairless, unless the coated is het for hairless anyways. Then you have the chance of getting hairless and coated.

    The amount of fur also depends on which hairless gene your working with, and I dont know that each hairless gene is compatible with eachother. I also dont know which one is the most popular, but I'm guessing the shorn hairless... lol

    Here ya go, some hairless reading.
    http://www.ratbehavior.org/CoatTypes.htm#Nude

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1