Ethical question

[catawhat75]

Ok, a post on fauna got me thinking (and boy do I remember now why I don't frequent fauna anymore!)...
Person A buys what is supposed to be a 100% het, turns around and later sells to Person B as 100% het. Person A then finds out some months/yr later that it is most likely not a het. How should person A handle the situation? How would you handle the situation?

[CeraDigital]

I'd contact person B, explain to them the situation, and offer a refund, or exchange.

[joepythons]

I'd contact person B, explain to them the situation, and offer a refund, or exchange.

I agree then person A gets refund from the breeder

[JASBALLS]

I'd just get banned! But I do think person A was being dealt the wrong hand before and after the deal..

[joepythons]

Lord have mercy that thread involves TSE and his worthless wannabe hets .This can only get ugly .

[catawhat75]

But what if there is no way person A will get a refund from the original breeder? Do you still refund?

[JASBALLS]

Can this active thread be posted here?

[joepythons]

Can this active thread be posted here?

I am sure its something everyone prefers to view on fauna .We had enough of the TSE crap back then

[catawhat75]

LOL Jas, it was you who got me thinking all this. I am sure people can find the OP thread if they go looking, and I am sure I won't be posting to it there.

[JASBALLS]

LOL Jas, it was you who got me thinking all this. I am sure people can find the OP thread if they go looking, and I am sure I won't be posting to it there.

What did I do?? LOL!!