» Site Navigation
0 members and 705 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.
» Today's Birthdays
» Stats
Members: 75,910
Threads: 249,115
Posts: 2,572,187
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, coda
|
-
Registered User
so from what i understand.....
hey so thanks again for all the info....if you guys dont mind can u tlel me if what im listing now is correct form the knowledge ive gained tonight?
bumble x bumble = bumble because they are both homozygous
bumble x normal (wild type)= 25% normal 25% pastel 25% spider 25 bumble
albino x normal= het albino because the albino is recessive. normal has albino gene although it looks liek a normal
het x het = 25% normal 25 % homo 50% hets.
thanks!
-
-
Re: so from what i understand.....
Almost... a Bumble Bee isn't homozygous but rather a double codom (or codom/dom). So if you breed a Bumble to a Bumble you will get normals, pastels, super pastels, spiders, and Killer Bees (Super pastel/spider).

-Lawrence
-
-
BPnet Veteran
Re: so from what i understand.....
 Originally Posted by xdeus
Almost... a Bumble Bee isn't homozygous but rather a double codom (or codom/dom). So if you breed a Bumble to a Bumble you will get normals, pastels, super pastels, spiders, and Killer Bees (Super pastel/spider).
I cant help but fantasize about how awesome it would be to have all of those babies and morphs in one clutch.....that would blow my mind.
I rack my husbands balls & show my rack on Ball-Pythons.net
~I make girls with balls look good~
Qiksilver "yes, watch your children, I'll convert them to satanism..."
-
-
Registered User
Re: so from what i understand.....
i was just thig the same thing!
-
-
Re: so from what i understand.....
Oh, I forgot one... MORE BUMBLEBEES!

-Lawrence
-
-
BPnet Veteran
Re: so from what i understand.....
 Originally Posted by xdeus
Almost... a Bumble Bee isn't homozygous but rather a double codom (or codom/dom). So if you breed a Bumble to a Bumble you will get normals, pastels, super pastels, spiders, and Killer Bees (Super pastel/spider).
You should also get homozygous spiders, and homozygous spider bumblebees. But you wouldn't be able to tell by looking at them which spiders are homozygous and which are het.
adi, to get all bumblebees all the time, you would need a homozygous spider and a super pastel.
Steve
-
-
Re: so from what i understand.....
 Originally Posted by adi
het x het = 25% normal 25 % homo 50% hets.
25% homozygous, the rest are 66% poss hets
You can't tell for sure since only 2 out of 3 normal appearing animals from this cross will actually be true hets. Therefore, we call them 66% poss hets due to those 2/3 odds.
-
-
Re: so from what i understand.....
 Originally Posted by hoo-t
You should also get homozygous spiders, and homozygous spider bumblebees. But you wouldn't be able to tell by looking at them which spiders are homozygous and which are het.
adi, to get all bumblebees all the time, you would need a homozygous spider and a super pastel.
Well, I left that out because as far as I know the homozygous spider hasn't been proven... unless you know something I don't?

-Lawrence
-
-
Re: so from what i understand.....
 Originally Posted by xdeus
Well, I left that out because as far as I know the homozygous spider hasn't been proven... unless you know something I don't? 
At this point, it is probably safe to say that there is no "super" version of a spider, but that doesn't mean that a spider can't be a homozygous carrier of the gene. Its certainly possible, but the spider in question won't look any different than a heterozygous spider. You would basically prove it out through a breeding program.
Don't be confused either by using the terms homozygous and heterozygous with dominant/co-dominant genes. Some people were confused about the whole "heterozygous pastel" thing in thinking I was referring to "het pastels" as if it were a recessive trait. We are talking about dominant genes here.
-
-
BPnet Veteran
Re: so from what i understand.....
 Originally Posted by elevatethis
At this point, it is probably safe to say that there is no "super" version of a spider, but that doesn't mean that a spider can't be a homozygous carrier of the gene. Its certainly possible, but the spider in question won't look any different than a heterozygous spider. You would basically prove it out through a breeding program.
Don't be confused either by using the terms homozygous and heterozygous with dominant/co-dominant genes. Some people were confused about the whole "heterozygous pastel" thing in thinking I was referring to "het pastels" as if it were a recessive trait. We are talking about dominant genes here.
Thanks, Brad.
Further, if spider is true dominant, it won't be proven until proven with DNA mapping. A homozygous spider will throw all spiders. But it is POSSIBLE for a heterozygous spider to throw all spiders (however unlikely it might be). I'm too lazy to go look, but was it EClark that posted he has a male spider that threw all spiders this year? He can be reasonably sure that its homozygous, but can't call it proven. If it throws all spiders next year, he can be darn sure, but still not proven. I wanted to ask him if he knew the parentage, but I didn't do it.
Steve
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|