Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 705

0 members and 705 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

» Stats

Members: 75,910
Threads: 249,115
Posts: 2,572,187
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, coda
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1
    Registered User adi's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-24-2006
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    304
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Images: 3

    so from what i understand.....

    hey so thanks again for all the info....if you guys dont mind can u tlel me if what im listing now is correct form the knowledge ive gained tonight?

    bumble x bumble = bumble because they are both homozygous

    bumble x normal (wild type)= 25% normal 25% pastel 25% spider 25 bumble

    albino x normal= het albino because the albino is recessive. normal has albino gene although it looks liek a normal

    het x het = 25% normal 25 % homo 50% hets.

    thanks!

  2. #2
    Cloacal Popping Engineer xdeus's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-15-2005
    Location
    Monterey, California
    Posts
    5,198
    Thanks
    210
    Thanked 447 Times in 266 Posts
    Images: 45

    Re: so from what i understand.....

    Almost... a Bumble Bee isn't homozygous but rather a double codom (or codom/dom). So if you breed a Bumble to a Bumble you will get normals, pastels, super pastels, spiders, and Killer Bees (Super pastel/spider).

    -Lawrence

  3. #3
    BPnet Veteran TheAudOne's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-11-2006
    Location
    In my happy place
    Posts
    1,127
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Images: 17

    Re: so from what i understand.....

    Quote Originally Posted by xdeus
    Almost... a Bumble Bee isn't homozygous but rather a double codom (or codom/dom). So if you breed a Bumble to a Bumble you will get normals, pastels, super pastels, spiders, and Killer Bees (Super pastel/spider).
    I cant help but fantasize about how awesome it would be to have all of those babies and morphs in one clutch.....that would blow my mind.
    I rack my husbands balls & show my rack on Ball-Pythons.net
    ~I make girls with balls look good~

    Qiksilver "
    yes, watch your children, I'll convert them to satanism..."

  4. #4
    Registered User adi's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-24-2006
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    304
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Images: 3

    Re: so from what i understand.....

    i was just thig the same thing!

  5. #5
    Cloacal Popping Engineer xdeus's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-15-2005
    Location
    Monterey, California
    Posts
    5,198
    Thanks
    210
    Thanked 447 Times in 266 Posts
    Images: 45

    Re: so from what i understand.....

    Oh, I forgot one... MORE BUMBLEBEES!

    -Lawrence

  6. #6
    BPnet Veteran hoo-t's Avatar
    Join Date
    06-02-2006
    Location
    Oklahoma City
    Posts
    944
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 13 Times in 13 Posts
    Images: 36

    Re: so from what i understand.....

    Quote Originally Posted by xdeus
    Almost... a Bumble Bee isn't homozygous but rather a double codom (or codom/dom). So if you breed a Bumble to a Bumble you will get normals, pastels, super pastels, spiders, and Killer Bees (Super pastel/spider).
    You should also get homozygous spiders, and homozygous spider bumblebees. But you wouldn't be able to tell by looking at them which spiders are homozygous and which are het.

    adi, to get all bumblebees all the time, you would need a homozygous spider and a super pastel.

    Steve

  7. #7
    BPnet Veteran elevatethis's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-18-2004
    Location
    Richmond, VA
    Posts
    4,348
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 83 Times in 21 Posts
    Images: 39

    Re: so from what i understand.....

    Quote Originally Posted by adi

    het x het = 25% normal 25 % homo 50% hets.
    25% homozygous, the rest are 66% poss hets

    You can't tell for sure since only 2 out of 3 normal appearing animals from this cross will actually be true hets. Therefore, we call them 66% poss hets due to those 2/3 odds.
    -Brad

  8. #8
    Cloacal Popping Engineer xdeus's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-15-2005
    Location
    Monterey, California
    Posts
    5,198
    Thanks
    210
    Thanked 447 Times in 266 Posts
    Images: 45

    Re: so from what i understand.....

    Quote Originally Posted by hoo-t
    You should also get homozygous spiders, and homozygous spider bumblebees. But you wouldn't be able to tell by looking at them which spiders are homozygous and which are het.

    adi, to get all bumblebees all the time, you would need a homozygous spider and a super pastel.
    Well, I left that out because as far as I know the homozygous spider hasn't been proven... unless you know something I don't?

    -Lawrence

  9. #9
    BPnet Veteran elevatethis's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-18-2004
    Location
    Richmond, VA
    Posts
    4,348
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 83 Times in 21 Posts
    Images: 39

    Re: so from what i understand.....

    Quote Originally Posted by xdeus
    Well, I left that out because as far as I know the homozygous spider hasn't been proven... unless you know something I don't?
    At this point, it is probably safe to say that there is no "super" version of a spider, but that doesn't mean that a spider can't be a homozygous carrier of the gene. Its certainly possible, but the spider in question won't look any different than a heterozygous spider. You would basically prove it out through a breeding program.

    Don't be confused either by using the terms homozygous and heterozygous with dominant/co-dominant genes. Some people were confused about the whole "heterozygous pastel" thing in thinking I was referring to "het pastels" as if it were a recessive trait. We are talking about dominant genes here.
    -Brad

  10. #10
    BPnet Veteran hoo-t's Avatar
    Join Date
    06-02-2006
    Location
    Oklahoma City
    Posts
    944
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 13 Times in 13 Posts
    Images: 36

    Re: so from what i understand.....

    Quote Originally Posted by elevatethis
    At this point, it is probably safe to say that there is no "super" version of a spider, but that doesn't mean that a spider can't be a homozygous carrier of the gene. Its certainly possible, but the spider in question won't look any different than a heterozygous spider. You would basically prove it out through a breeding program.

    Don't be confused either by using the terms homozygous and heterozygous with dominant/co-dominant genes. Some people were confused about the whole "heterozygous pastel" thing in thinking I was referring to "het pastels" as if it were a recessive trait. We are talking about dominant genes here.
    Thanks, Brad.

    Further, if spider is true dominant, it won't be proven until proven with DNA mapping. A homozygous spider will throw all spiders. But it is POSSIBLE for a heterozygous spider to throw all spiders (however unlikely it might be). I'm too lazy to go look, but was it EClark that posted he has a male spider that threw all spiders this year? He can be reasonably sure that its homozygous, but can't call it proven. If it throws all spiders next year, he can be darn sure, but still not proven. I wanted to ask him if he knew the parentage, but I didn't do it.

    Steve

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1