Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 743

0 members and 743 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,905
Threads: 249,105
Posts: 2,572,114
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Pattyhud
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Threaded View

  1. #1
    BPnet Lifer Bogertophis's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-28-2018
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    20,789
    Thanks
    29,346
    Thanked 20,562 Times in 12,287 Posts

    Thought for Food-

    Yes, I intentionally reversed the phrase "food for thought" Discussion invited.

    From reading many posts for many years, I'd say "most" BP owners feed their snakes on a schedule, yet sooner or later most BP owners experience finicky eaters that refuse food. One wonders how can these snakes survive in the wild if this behavior is typical? But maybe it's not- maybe we're creating this by over-feeding &/or being too predictable. But after all, our lives are busy & keeping track of feeding a snake makes sense, so we don't forget to feed our pets often enough, especially if we're unaccustomed to keeping snakes.

    We can be sure that in the wild, snakes do not find food on any sort of a schedule. Does this make them more likely to maintain a vigorous appetite? Are conditions in the wild (including more activity & more stimulating conditions) also the reason they eat every chance they get?

    From watching wildlife videos (not to mention our own "common sense") we know that snakes do not succeed in catching prey every time they try- sometimes the prey literally gets away. When experiments are done with other animals, or even humans, it's generally found that if the subject is NOT rewarded consistently (not fed each time they perform a specific behavior), they actually work harder than if they'd been rewarded every time. So, would our captive snakes be more likely to eat IF their meals were a bit less predictable? Most of us would agree that teasing animals seems "mean", but what would happen if every now & then, when a snake is due to feed, we give them a good whiff of their prey that is never actually offered, as if it got away? Would they be more inclined to grab for it next time, instead of being "fussy"? I've never tried this, but I have to wonder?

    In the first post of a recent thread (https://ball-pythons.net/forums/show...=1#post2775569), a member mentions:
    Quote Originally Posted by Kryptic View Post
    ...I intentionally feed him erratically (not on a fixed schedule and different sized feeders)...
    and his snake (BP) has "been a ravenous eater since day one".

    Now we all realize that young BPs usually eat more consistently than mature ones, and also that ONE example is certainly not enough to base any conclusions on. Still, maybe this is something we should keep in mind? We all hate it when our pet snake won't eat, even though most of us understand on some level that this is fairly "normal" (with BPs especially).

    We humans thrive on predictability- do we (consciously or otherwise) expect the same of our snakes? And we all want to see healthy growth in our snakes. Is it possible that by making food so readily available to our snakes that we're making food refusal more likely? Just something to think about, & please share your thoughts.
    Rudeness is the weak man's imitation of strength.
    Eric Hoffer (1902 - 1983)

    The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated.” ~ Gandhi

  2. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Bogertophis For This Useful Post:

    EL-Ziggy (06-07-2023),Homebody (06-06-2023),KingPythons (06-07-2023),nikkubus (06-07-2023),Ruby (06-06-2023)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1