Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 848

0 members and 848 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,905
Threads: 249,104
Posts: 2,572,103
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Pattyhud
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17
  1. #1
    Registered User gator8811's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-04-2013
    Posts
    199
    Thanks
    99
    Thanked 33 Times in 30 Posts

    Calico vs. Sugar

    So all you experts, what's the difference between a sugar and calico?

    Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 4

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    02-09-2013
    Posts
    2,385
    Thanks
    200
    Thanked 581 Times in 459 Posts
    if you want one, i suggest you search for both calico and sugar until you find one you really like, and then get it no matter if its a calico or sugar.


    its either identical or very, very similar.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Pythonfriend For This Useful Post:

    gator8811 (10-11-2013)

  4. #3
    Registered User gator8811's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-04-2013
    Posts
    199
    Thanks
    99
    Thanked 33 Times in 30 Posts
    Well my buddy is selling a 750g sugar female for 650 and can't get it moved. He's got 80 snakes and trying to downsize to just one rack and told me if I help him build some rat racks I can have her for 375 and give him $50 payments. I'm getting her regardless but was just wondering the difference.

    Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 4

  5. #4
    Apprentice SPAM Janitor MarkS's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-22-2005
    Location
    St Paul, MN
    Posts
    6,209
    Thanks
    1,535
    Thanked 2,678 Times in 1,596 Posts
    Blog Entries
    9
    Images: 3
    It can be a bit of a heated debate, but personally I think they're like Lessers and Butters. The same mutation from different lines. You'll get nice looking ones and not so nice looking ones from both lines with individuals with the most amount of white being in the highest demand.
    Last edited by MarkS; 10-11-2013 at 07:51 PM.

  6. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MarkS For This Useful Post:

    gator8811 (10-11-2013),Mike41793 (10-12-2013)

  7. #5
    Registered User gator8811's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-04-2013
    Posts
    199
    Thanks
    99
    Thanked 33 Times in 30 Posts
    Ya that's what I figured. She's not the highest white but not the lowest. I guess about normal. So I figured 375 on payments was fantastic. About 50-75 a month. Also gonna let me take a 200g bumblebee female for 200 on same payments. Figured why not. I've always wanted a calico.

    Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 4

  8. #6
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    08-14-2012
    Location
    NEPA
    Posts
    634
    Thanks
    70
    Thanked 229 Times in 204 Posts
    I've been checking out both a lot lately. and while they both seem to have the same appearance sugars seem to more consitantly throw higher whites. I've seen a pile of calicos so low white they have little if any on them. I could count on one hand how many sugars I have seen like that.

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to dillan2020 For This Useful Post:

    gator8811 (10-11-2013)

  10. #7
    BPnet Veteran satomi325's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-15-2011
    Location
    In a galaxy far,far away.
    Posts
    6,423
    Thanks
    2,429
    Thanked 3,969 Times in 2,446 Posts
    Images: 5
    Same mutation, different likes like MarkS said.
    However, I do think the sugar has been better selected, thus more consistent looks (black back, better overall color, high whites) in my opinion.

    I have a calico myself and think sugar is the 'better' of the two. At least these days.
    I've seen many different calicos and sugars. In my opinion, a nice sugar is way better than a nice calico.

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to satomi325 For This Useful Post:

    MarkS (10-11-2013)

  12. #8
    Apprentice SPAM Janitor MarkS's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-22-2005
    Location
    St Paul, MN
    Posts
    6,209
    Thanks
    1,535
    Thanked 2,678 Times in 1,596 Posts
    Blog Entries
    9
    Images: 3

    Re: Calico vs. Sugar

    Quote Originally Posted by satomi325 View Post
    Same mutation, different likes like MarkS said.
    However, I do think the sugar has been better selected,
    That's a good way of saying it. I also have seen better looking sugar, but I think it has more to do with the originator taking more care in selecting what the founder was bred to rather then any difference in the mutation itself.

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to MarkS For This Useful Post:

    satomi325 (10-11-2013)

  14. #9
    Registered User gator8811's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-04-2013
    Posts
    199
    Thanks
    99
    Thanked 33 Times in 30 Posts

    Re: Calico vs. Sugar



    That's her guys.

    Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 4

  15. #10
    BPnet Senior Member Royal Hijinx's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-01-2011
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    3,842
    Thanks
    1,120
    Thanked 1,989 Times in 1,155 Posts
    This is a single gene Calico female that I bought for $310. I will put her up against any Sugar out there. The point being that I too think they are 2 lines of the same morph. The price premium for a Sugar is unnecessary if you are willing to look for the right Calico.





    I think you are getting a sweet deal on the gal your getting, especially for her size. Not as much white as I like to see, but that can be improved with the right male bred to her.

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to Royal Hijinx For This Useful Post:

    gator8811 (10-12-2013)

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1