» Site Navigation
1 members and 622 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.
» Today's Birthdays
» Stats
Members: 75,905
Threads: 249,103
Posts: 2,572,096
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
|
-
Registered User
Artificial vs. natural incubation
So, I sat myself down tonight and worked out the logistics of building my own snake rack. Im pretty happy with The schematic I drew up, but I moved on to the idea of building my own incubator. After watching quite a few youtube do it yourself videos and seeing one or two mothers tightly coiled around their eggs I started to wonder why we dont just let them hatch all by themselves. Unfortunately I didnt find very much information on the subject via google. I was curious as to whether you guys allow the mother to do what she does or incubate them yourselves, and the pros and cons of both. = P
-
-
Basically it's difficult to control the environmental variables to a degree that most people would feel comfortable doing that. I personally do substrate-less incubation similar in style to what a lot of Chrondo breeders do and have had fantastic results from it.
-
-
Registered User
Re: Artificial vs. natural incubation
No substrate really? How do you give them the proper humidity? Just have water within the incubator?
-
-
Re: Artificial vs. natural incubation
 Originally Posted by Riv
No substrate really? How do you give them the proper humidity? Just have water within the incubator?
Basically yes. They sit on elevated egg crate which has a pool of water below it. If you look up Chrondo incubator videos on YouTube you'll see what I'm talking about.
-
-
Maternal incubation is possible and the female will eat, f/t is definitely preferred. But most prefer to remove the eggs so they r set up in an egg tub where temp and humidity can be controlled and kept more stable. This relieves stress from the female and provides a better environment for eggs. See the sticky in BP Breeding of setting up an egg tub
A room full of empty racks and thermostats that have been unplugged.
*Chris*
-
-
0.1 Dinker (Goliath), 1.1 Het Ghost (Hercules & Athena), 1.0 Lesser (Titan), 0.1 Het Albino (Arya), 0.1 Wild Caught (Cleopatra), 1.1 Het VPI Axanthic (Perseus & Aphrodite), 1.0 Albino (Midas), 1.0 Butter (Samson), 0.1 Spider (Delilah), 1.1 Mojave (Apollo & Pandora), 0.1 Yellowbelly (Venus), 1.1 Het Pied (Isis & Osiris), 1.0 Bumblebee (Orion), 1.0 (Poss G Stripe) Pied (Spartacus), 0.1 Normal (Bandit), 1.0 Albino Burm (Caesar),2.1 Dogs, 0.2 Cats, 0.0.1 African Dwarf Frog, 0.0.2 Vicious Fishes, 1.0 child, 1.0 husband
In Loving Memory: 1.0 Pastel Zeus, 0.1 het Albino Anya
I'm a girl, I have snakes, I have tattoos, and I have piercings.
The more I talk to humans, the more I prefer my snakes.
http://www.iherp.com/julieinnj
-
-
Registered User
Re: Artificial vs. natural incubation
I read through your entire thread as well as quiet tempests. I found both of them very informative and useful. Im opting towards maternally incubating, and just running an incubator just in case something goes awry. Unfortunately my fiance and I have opposite views here. He doesnt necessarily believe the incubator will do a better job, just a more consistent job, and he wants to ensure the female starts eating better sooner rather than later. So we're probably going to wind up incubating after all. I am going to be stubborn about maternally incubating AT LEAST one clutch though. I really want to try it.
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|