» Site Navigation
0 members and 2,852 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 6,337, 01-24-2020 at 04:30 AM.
» Today's Birthdays
» Stats
Members: 75,129
Threads: 248,574
Posts: 2,569,008
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
|
-
01-15-2008, 08:11 PM
#111
Registered User
Re: Introducing a New Method for Enforcing TOS/Site Rules
[QUOTE=wilomn;699189][QUOTE=bcampos;699185]
Originally Posted by wilomn
Translation:
I got called to the mat for flapping my lips, didn't like it, couldn't take it, didn't know how to deal with it, so I took my ball and went home, which is what I'll do again if you guys keep being mean to me.
Now I understand. You post stuff just to get folks talking, not meaning to make any sense. Well, you've succeeded.
We're talking and you're not making any sense.
Good job there little buckeroo, good job.
Wow that's alot of typing there...
Besides, I am home, how can I go home if I am already home. And I have 2 snakes, not 1.
-Camp
0.0.1 Normal
0.1 Spider
"...and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him."
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin
-
-
01-15-2008, 08:12 PM
#112
Re: Introducing a New Method for Enforcing TOS/Site Rules
[QUOTE=wilomn;699189][QUOTE=bcampos;699185]
Originally Posted by wilomn
Translation:
I got called to the mat for flapping my lips, didn't like it, couldn't take it, didn't know how to deal with it, so I took my ball and went home, which is what I'll do again if you guys keep being mean to me.
Now I understand. You post stuff just to get folks talking, not meaning to make any sense. Well, you've succeeded.
We're talking and you're not making any sense.
Good job there little buckeroo, good job.
^^^^^^ is..
Bear-Baiting -- 5 pts
Poking a stick at someone you know is going to lose their temper. TRYING to get someone to lose their temper. Trying to pick a fight.
Just Saying! Mods???
-
-
01-15-2008, 08:29 PM
#113
BPnet Veteran
Re: Introducing a New Method for Enforcing TOS/Site Rules
gee bear biting sure sounds alot like pm i got from a user the other night actually this is the second one from the same user.
-
-
01-15-2008, 08:46 PM
#114
Re: Introducing a New Method for Enforcing TOS/Site Rules
Originally Posted by nixer
gee bear biting sure sounds alot like pm i got from a user the other night actually this is the second one from the same user.
If you have PM's that you are concerned with, you may send it to any member of the staff to review.
-
-
01-15-2008, 08:49 PM
#115
Re: Introducing a New Method for Enforcing TOS/Site Rules
[QUOTE=JASBALLS;699193][QUOTE=wilomn;699189]
Originally Posted by bcampos
^^^^^^ is..
Bear-Baiting -- 5 pts
Poking a stick at someone you know is going to lose their temper. TRYING to get someone to lose their temper. Trying to pick a fight.
Just Saying! Mods???
John, please let the staff manage the infraction system.
-
-
01-15-2008, 08:56 PM
#116
Re: Introducing a New Method for Enforcing TOS/Site Rules
[QUOTE=rabernet;699218][QUOTE=JASBALLS;699193]
Originally Posted by wilomn
John, please let the staff manage the infraction system.
I would if, Never mind LOL!! You got it...
-
-
01-15-2008, 08:57 PM
#117
BPnet Veteran
Re: Introducing a New Method for Enforcing TOS/Site Rules
Originally Posted by rabernet
If you have PM's that you are concerned with, you may send it to any member of the staff to review.
i already did so last night!
-
-
01-15-2008, 10:17 PM
#118
Re: Introducing a New Method for Enforcing TOS/Site Rules
so in all three of these pages i dont think i read what the numbers mean after.....
Infractions: blah? (blah?)
what are these?
-
-
01-15-2008, 10:18 PM
#119
Re: Introducing a New Method for Enforcing TOS/Site Rules
infractions (point value)
-
-
01-15-2008, 11:31 PM
#120
Re: Introducing a New Method for Enforcing TOS/Site Rules
[QUOTE=bcampos;699192][QUOTE=wilomn;699189]
Originally Posted by bcampos
Wow that's alot of typing there...
Besides, I am home, how can I go home if I am already home. And I have 2 snakes, not 1.
Another word you seem to have improper grasp of the actual meaning of. You see, above is, if my count is correct, an 80 word post.
I hardly think that qualifies as a lot. A LOT, using a very loose and unlooked up definition, would seem to be more than a few, far more than several, and way more than a bunch.
Heck, just on this site I've written posts that must be several hundred words and I'd hardly qualify them as being made up of a LOT of words. Of course, I am prone to verbiage so perhaps it's just me.
Still though, I think, once again, that you have misspoken yourself. You seem to make a habit of this and you may want to look into it. It leads to hoofinmouth disease and severe toeandtonsil trauma (from having your feet shoved so far into your oral orifice) which can be most distressing not only to you yourself but those to whom you speak.
I don't recall the number of snakes you have coming into question, but then I seem to be the only one who recalled that it was YOU who brought "text book" definitions into this thread.
What does, if you don't mind not answering yet another question, the number of snakes you have got to do with the communistic slant this site has, according to you only, taken of late.
Are you intentionally trying to confuse me?
I may not be very smart, but what if I am?
Stinky says, "Women should be obscene but not heard." Stinky is one smart man.
www.humanewatch.org
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|