Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 895

3 members and 892 guests
Most users ever online was 9,191, 03-09-2025 at 12:17 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,796
Threads: 249,015
Posts: 2,571,706
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Jdp02
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 11 of 11
  1. #11
    BPnet Senior Member Lord Sorril's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-05-2018
    Location
    Massachusetts - USA
    Posts
    1,831
    Thanks
    814
    Thanked 3,966 Times in 1,441 Posts
    Images: 120

    Re: A hypothetical breeding question

    Quote Originally Posted by paulh View Post
    Breeding a possible het x possible het is a losing proposition unless absolutely necessary. Because the majority of the matings are either het x normal or normal x normal.
    Yep! You have good math.

    The X factor is that *some* (not all) recessive genes in the Het form are capable of leaving clues that can be observed by a keeper familiar with that genetic line (aka distorted patterns/lightened coloration/oversaturation of pigment/ringers).
    If the snake has zero deviations-then you are stuck relying on genetic odds...which I think would be awful and probably not worth the time/effort to proof breed...
    *.* TNTC

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Lord Sorril For This Useful Post:

    Homebody (01-21-2025)

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1