Not sure exactly what I have.

[K.Stone]

Thank you so much.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[YungRasputin]

No, it would not

is it because the morphs are comparable or complimentary as opposed to our previous Kahl/T+ Albino discussion?

[jmcrook]

is it because the morphs are comparable or complimentary as opposed to our previous Kahl/T+ Albino discussion?

I'm not trying to hijack the OP's thread so keeping this short and sweet. The animal is listed as 100% het albino. It is not guaranteed het for anything else. Add the numbers up and you'll understand why it can't be double or triple het. Time for you to do some research into Mendelian genetics and work through some punnett squares.

[YungRasputin]

I'm not trying to hijack the OP's thread so keeping this short and sweet. The animal is listed as 100% het albino. It is not guaranteed het for anything else. Add the numbers up and you'll understand why it can't be double or triple het. Time for you to do some research into Mendelian genetics and work through some punnett squares.

i didn’t mean to offend - i was just curious and seeing the OP being seemingly satisfied in the previous responses, just thought to ask and didn’t think it would be a grave imposition - thank you for your input