Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 617

5 members and 612 guests
Most users ever online was 6,337, 01-24-2020 at 03:30 AM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 71,292
Threads: 245,361
Posts: 2,543,552
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, ALegionOfTrees
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 21 of 21
  1. #21
    Registered User Hugsplox's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-27-2020
    Location
    Georgia, U.S.
    Posts
    544
    Thanks
    1,177
    Thanked 826 Times in 412 Posts

    Re: Usark- new alerts!

    https://usark.org/2021-ca/

    Just wanted to share this as well, a California place holder bill was introduced in February but the text wasn't posted until March 4th. This is what a lot of us are talking about as you read into it, talking about banning certain species that "may" be responsible for the spread or "may" possess zoonotic diseases.

    From USARK

    The overall concern of this bill is an overreaching, knee-jerk approach to live animal zoonoses. Animal rights and deceitful “enviro” groups are capitalizing on the COVID-19 crisis in efforts to ban all animals from our lives. It does not matter if the animals are bred under human care. Even domesticated species bred domestically are being attacked. These groups want them all banned and they are spreading misinformation widely and spending millions of dollars to lobby legislators. So while SB376 does not seem too concerning, there are risks involved with it as well as the many other proposals we will see at all levels of government.

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Hugsplox For This Useful Post:

    bcr229 (03-08-2021),Bogertophis (03-08-2021)

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1