Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ


» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 59,588
Threads: 229,956
Posts: 2,370,331
Top Poster: JLC (31,652)
Welcome to our newest member, TeFitisMama

» January 2018

S M T W T F S
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31 1 2 3
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 40 of 40
  1. #31
    Eric Alan's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-01-2013
    Location
    Gilbert, AZ
    Posts
    4,498
    Thanks
    2,914
    Thanked 3,828 Times in 1,938 Posts
    Images: 1
    Thanks, paulh. That's the reason I followed-up with my post below that one.

    Admittedly, Bumblebee wasn't the best example. Or even really a good one. It was only meant to illustrate the difference between showing a blended phenotype versus one that expresses both genes fully - not to imply that Pastel and Spider were allelic.
    Find me on Facebook: E.B. Ball Pythons and Instagram: @EBBallPythons


  2. #32
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    08-31-2011
    Posts
    457
    Thanks
    97
    Thanked 178 Times in 127 Posts

    Re: Ball python single gene morph descriptions -need feedback

    I have no objection to the term "incomplete dominant" so long as it is defined as producing a blended phenotype in the heterozygote and makes no assumptions as to allelic products. My point has always been that incomplete dominance and codominance have different mechanisms that produce results that are difficult for the naked eye to distinguish.

    By the way, the biochemists have identified 5 mechanisms that can produce incomplete dominance or codominance. So I predict future changes in the definitions.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to paulh For This Useful Post:

    Eric Alan (11-23-2017)

  4. #33
    Registered User
    Join Date
    10-02-2017
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    19
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 7 Times in 3 Posts
    Again, thanks everyone for the very helpful replies! Right now, like I said, the most important thing is for me to verify as many single-gene mutant phenotypes as possible, so that my dataset (and thus the statistical tests that result from it) are as robust as possible.

    I have created a Google spreadsheet with the basic parts of the dataset, as well as a "verification" column. What I need people to do is to go through this spreadsheet and put a "V" under the morphs that they know to be legitimate. In the comments, please leave your username and which morphs you verified, as I need to know my sources. If someone has already put a "V" next to one that you know to be legitimate, just put another V - that way I know that morphs with multiple "V"s have been examined by multiple people.

    In the comments, please feel free to make suggestions for descriptions and whatnot, as that will help me improve my dataset.

    Here is the link:
    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...it?usp=sharing

  5. #34
    Registered User
    Join Date
    10-02-2017
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    19
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 7 Times in 3 Posts

    Re: Ball python single gene morph descriptions -need feedback

    Quote Originally Posted by paulh View Post
    My point has always been that incomplete dominance and codominance have different mechanisms that produce results that are difficult for the naked eye to distinguish.

    By the way, the biochemists have identified 5 mechanisms that can produce incomplete dominance or codominance. So I predict future changes in the definitions.
    For your first point, do you have any sources that I could look at for this (preferably peer-reviewed papers)? This may be a topic I could address in my paper, if I have formal literature to back up any points I make.

    As to your second point, what biochemists are you referring to (ie what institution)? Is there a publication I could check out? So far, I think the most obvious mechanism for incomplete dominance would be allelic insufficiency, but understanding other types of phenomena that result in codominance or incomplete dominance would be highly useful.

  6. #35
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    08-31-2011
    Posts
    457
    Thanks
    97
    Thanked 178 Times in 127 Posts
    Point 1:
    I can cite a genetics textbook used at the local university, but I have to get into the univ. library to get the information. I'll get back to you on that. In the meantime, you can look at the entry on "incomplete dominance" in Encyclopedia of genetics / editor, Jeffrey A. Knight ; project editor, Robert McClenaghan. 1999. 2 vols. ISBN : 089356978X. And see "Hemoglobin genetics" at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sickle_cell_trait. Using different tests, it classifies the sickle cell gene as a recessive, an incomplete dominant, and a codominant mutant.

    Point 2:
    Wilkie, A. O. 1994. The molecular basis of genetic dominance. J Med Genet. 31(2): 81-98. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1049666/.

  7. #36
    Registered User
    Join Date
    10-02-2017
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    19
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 7 Times in 3 Posts
    Thank you very much! This certainly helps - especially the latter source. I don't know how I missed that one in my literature search. I will certainly have to cite that in my discussion.

  8. #37
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    08-31-2011
    Posts
    457
    Thanks
    97
    Thanked 178 Times in 127 Posts

    Re: Ball python single gene morph descriptions -need feedback

    Reference for point 1:
    Snustad, D. Peter, and Michael J. Simmons. Principles of Genetics. John H. Wiley, 6th ed., 2012, ISBN 978-0-470-90359-9.

    See Incomplete Dominance and Codominance, pp 63-64. This is essentially a shorter restatement of the entry in the Encyclopedia of Genetics.

    I will send pdf copies of all the source material to anyone who PMs me with their e-mail address.

  9. #38
    Registered User
    Join Date
    10-02-2017
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    19
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 7 Times in 3 Posts
    I would like to say thank you again to everyone who has helped - right now I have narrowed my list down to 79 verified single-gene mutations. This is certainly enough to do my statistical analyses.

    However, my professor noted that one thing we should try to include in our publication is the origins of the different morphs. While I know that the vast majority were introduced via imported individuals displaying an aberrant phenotype, I would like to be able to note any exceptions, such as mutants that appeared in a clutch hatched from an imported wildtype female, or de-novo mutations that appeared in captive-bred lines. It would also be important to include some statistics on ball python importation (ie how many animals have entered the US pet trade through importation annually), so if anyone knows where I might find that information, that would be fantastic. The only "source" I was able to find was from the HSUS, and given that they have an investment in portraying the exotic pet trade as harmful, their numbers would not be a reliable source.

  10. #39
    BPnet Lifer wolfy-hound's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-10-2005
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    5,492
    Thanks
    2,117
    Thanked 2,210 Times in 1,145 Posts
    Images: 23
    I would see if Micheal Cole of BallRoom PythonsSouth would know the import figures.
    Theresa Baker
    No Legs and More
    Florida, USA
    "Stop being a wimpy monkey,; bare some teeth, steal some food and fling poo with the alphas. "

  11. #40
    BPnet Veteran Ax01's Avatar
    Join Date
    06-14-2015
    Location
    Emerald City
    Posts
    3,864
    Thanks
    1,690
    Thanked 3,044 Times in 1,936 Posts
    Outback Reptiles also does a ton of importing.
    Wicked ones now on IG & FB!6292

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1