Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 3,007

0 members and 3,007 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 6,337, 01-24-2020 at 04:30 AM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,031
Threads: 248,489
Posts: 2,568,446
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, isismomma
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13
  1. #1
    BPnet Senior Member Royal Hijinx's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-01-2011
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    3,842
    Thanks
    1,120
    Thanked 1,989 Times in 1,155 Posts

    Macro focal length for snake photography?

    I finally bit the bullet and ordered a nicer camera for when I get home.

    For those of you taking pics of your animals with a macro lens, what is the preferred focal length?

  2. #2
    BPnet Senior Member kitedemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-01-2010
    Location
    NS Canada
    Posts
    6,062
    Thanks
    657
    Thanked 1,795 Times in 1,391 Posts
    Images: 11
    I actually have a 60mm micro, 105mm VR micro, and the old 200mm macro.

    I like my 60 for most things and the 200 for ill tempered ones.

  3. #3
    BPnet Senior Member Royal Hijinx's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-01-2011
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    3,842
    Thanks
    1,120
    Thanked 1,989 Times in 1,155 Posts
    Thanks. I am deciding on a 60mm or 100mm prime macro. I have the Sony NEX-6 (which is a mirrorless with a large sensor) and there is only one 30mm prime for it right now ($350). I will likely get the adapter and maybe a Canon or Nikon legacy lens and just manually focus it. I can get a decent used glass and adapter for a couple hundred bucks, or less.

    I have also considered using tubes as well, but I am not sure if they will give me the results I want with my 16-50mm kit lens.

  4. #4
    BPnet Senior Member kitedemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-01-2010
    Location
    NS Canada
    Posts
    6,062
    Thanks
    657
    Thanked 1,795 Times in 1,391 Posts
    Images: 11
    Tubes might but I would not hold my breath often they drop the sharpness as they mess up the optical formula, same for doublers there is a hit in optical quality.

    Macros (in macro) do not autofocus well so an adapter may work well it is hard to say I have never used one. My 200mm is quite old (nikon d700s here) it is manual but the meter works well although I use a flash for most of the macro work I do (product mostly). I am not well versed in the sony line so I can't say about what exact options are available. The 200 gives me about 10 inches or so the 60mm only a few inches 1-3 or so. Sometimes if you have a aggressive animal that just will not do. The 60mm get in the way of the lights sometimes as well so in closest macro mode it can be complex. I love it however 60mm optic is my fav and carry it on the camera almost all the time.

  5. #5
    BPnet Senior Member Royal Hijinx's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-01-2011
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    3,842
    Thanks
    1,120
    Thanked 1,989 Times in 1,155 Posts
    I went with a legacy manual macro lens. There were TONS to choose from at varying prices. So I found one in good shape and made an offer on eBay, and the rest is history.

    I picked up the Vivitar Series 1 90mm f/2.5 Macro and the 1:1 adapter for it. I guess this lens is known as the "Bokina"

    The lens by itself will give 1:2 (which is good for most work) and the adapter will make it 1:1 for super close stuff.

    The sensor size on the NEX-6 makes the effective focal length 135mm with this lens.

    This setup should be flexible for both portraits and macro. I paid not much more for the two part lens system than I would have for a magnifier or power extension tubes.

    I just need a Minolta MD-NEX adapter (about $20 on eBay) and I am set.

    I bought the hotshoe flash for the NEX-6 so that will help, along with the light box. I may look in to a flash ring or a slave triggered flash in the future.

    I will update everyone on how it works out when I get home! Thanks for all the input.

  6. #6
    BPnet Senior Member kitedemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-01-2010
    Location
    NS Canada
    Posts
    6,062
    Thanks
    657
    Thanked 1,795 Times in 1,391 Posts
    Images: 11
    http://ball-pythons.net/forums/showt...n-construction

    This might be useful then. I designed it for a jeweller but hey about the same. Ring flashes are interesting but the the bigger the ring is the better it looks that is the real kicker most cheap ones have small rings. I have a pair, one large and one small the large one is better than the other by quite a bit. Sadly the price tag is 10 times as well.

  7. #7
    BPnet Senior Member Royal Hijinx's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-01-2011
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    3,842
    Thanks
    1,120
    Thanked 1,989 Times in 1,155 Posts
    Yeah I have seen a few DIY diffusers online for the flash. The flash I bought has one built in, so I will s how that works.

    Yeah the nice Ring lights are pricey, I have not looked in to a external flash that I can slave off the onboard. We will see

    With tis lens I should also be able to get nature shots as well.

    The NEX-6 has a awesome focus peaking feature so I can use the viewfinder to while manually focusing.

  8. #8
    Venom Life Neal's Avatar
    Join Date
    11-23-2008
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    7,084
    Thanks
    601
    Thanked 2,140 Times in 1,556 Posts
    Blog Entries
    8
    Images: 1
    What's a very good camera that doesn't require me to fork out a lot of money?

    I mean considering I have the Panasonic DMC-ZS7 it's an okay for regular pictures, but I want to take really close shots of snakes and such. With that in mind I'm wanting something like a point & shoot camera, so what is something nice for under $300?
    -Venomous-

    1.0 - Naja siamensis - Zeus (Black & White Spitting Cobra)
    1.0 - Naja n. woodi - Hades (Black Spitting Cobra)
    0.1 - Naja nigricollis - Athena (Black-necked Spitting Cobra)

    coming at some point in the future
    Naja annulata (Ringed Water Cobra)




  9. #9
    BPnet Royalty Gio's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-28-2012
    Location
    Minneapolis
    Posts
    4,724
    Thanks
    6,879
    Thanked 6,571 Times in 2,984 Posts

    Re: Macro focal length for snake photography?

    Quote Originally Posted by Royal Hijinx View Post
    Thanks. I am deciding on a 60mm or 100mm prime macro. I have the Sony NEX-6 (which is a mirrorless with a large sensor) and there is only one 30mm prime for it right now ($350). I will likely get the adapter and maybe a Canon or Nikon legacy lens and just manually focus it. I can get a decent used glass and adapter for a couple hundred bucks, or less.

    I have also considered using tubes as well, but I am not sure if they will give me the results I want with my 16-50mm kit lens.
    Great camera! I have the NEX 3N. It looks like you already got your new glass but I've had decent success with the kit lens I got. They had a special and I also ended up with a 210 zoom.

    Here is a semi macro shot with the wide angle kit lens.



    I'd like to see the photos you get with the lens you bought.
    Last edited by Gio; 06-30-2013 at 09:18 AM.

  10. #10
    BPnet Senior Member Royal Hijinx's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-01-2011
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    3,842
    Thanks
    1,120
    Thanked 1,989 Times in 1,155 Posts

    Re: Macro focal length for snake photography?

    Quote Originally Posted by Neal View Post
    What's a very good camera that doesn't require me to fork out a lot of money?

    I mean considering I have the Panasonic DMC-ZS7 it's an okay for regular pictures, but I want to take really close shots of snakes and such. With that in mind I'm wanting something like a point & shoot camera, so what is something nice for under $300?
    There are a lot of great point and shoot cameras in that price range. If you look back at my pics here or on FB they were all taken with my Cypershot TX-10.

    Moving up to a camera where you can change lenses is going to set you back a lot more than $300.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1