Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 849

2 members and 847 guests
Most users ever online was 6,337, 01-24-2020 at 04:30 AM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,077
Threads: 248,523
Posts: 2,568,612
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, jpriebe2
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 28
  1. #11
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    10-30-2003
    Location
    Ancramdale, NY
    Posts
    1,241
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Images: 2

    (* *) Is this what the male and female sex glands look like?

    Bob clark has lucy "hets" already. They are called Fire Balls. Leucistics are now considered a co-dom trait. Fire balls are the "het" so to speak (just like the pastel is the "het" super pastel). You breed a fire ball to a normal and you get 50% fire balls and 50% normals. You breed two fire ball together and you get 50% fireballs and 50% leucistics. There is another line of leucistics that is recessive until proven otherwise. I personally don't consider it a lucy because it has a faint pattern, but it has blue eyes which is just amazing. You can get more info at bob clark's website (www.bobclark.com).



    Jennifer

  2. #12
    BPnet Veteran Marla's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-30-2003
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    3,294
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
    Images: 47
    Jen, I'm actually aware of all that, but as you probably know, three different types of leucistics have been identified and only the fireball type is known for semi-certain publicly what its genotype is. There's some discussion that platty x axanthic or albino x ? may be the path to the other forms of leucistic bp's.
    3.1.1 BP (Snyder, Hanover, Bo Peep, Sir NAITF, Eve), 1.2.3 Rhacodactylus ciliatus (Sandiego, Carmen, Scooby, Camo, BABIES ), 1.0 Chow (Buddha), 0.2 cats (Jezebel, PCBH "Nanners"), 0.3 humans
    xnview for resizing and coverting pics

    Support Ball-Pythons.net by shopping our store!

  3. #13
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    10-30-2003
    Location
    Ancramdale, NY
    Posts
    1,241
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Images: 2

    new friend

    Yup, leucistics will be fun for sure..

  4. #14
    Banned
    Join Date
    08-05-2003
    Posts
    1,356
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Mojaves are so freaking sweet... but at the moment the only morph I want is a real sweet pastel

  5. #15
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    11-13-2003
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    1,555
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 247 Times in 186 Posts
    Images: 28
    If fireball is het black eyed leucistic (I think it is very very likely based on the info disclosed so far, however, as the original breeder is adamantly pointing out on kingsnake it isn't yet a 100% sure thing) then fireball X fireball will produce babies that each have a 25% chance of being black eyed leucistic, 50% chance of being fireballs, and 25% chance of being normal. Don't get confused about the morph type (recessive, co-dominant, dominant) we are still talking het X het here so you would not get 50/50 firballs and leucistics. I know it's easy to mess up but I find thinking of the genotype (fireball =? het) helps me keep it straight.

    From his web site I see that Vin Russo is using the perhaps more correct term "incomplete dominant" for his blue eyed leucy where what he believes to be the hets he is calling High Yellow Lemons. I think I remember seeing these for sale before he produced the leucy and thinking they where overpriced, darn, wish I could have bought one at twice the price now! I didn't find any pics of his High Yellow Lemons now (maybe I was looking at something else before).

    The SnakeKeeper is calling their Ivory codominant. IMHO this might well be closely related to the other yellow stripe type leucistics but just with a little more color. They don't post a picture of give a name for the het form that I can find but I've heard people say that it might be what's called a "yellow belly".

    I can't seem to find it right now but I thought I read where Peter Kahl indicated that his leucistic had normal looking babies. I would actually be a little surprised at this point if his wasn't codominant but I have seen very little info on what is going on with that project. Anyone have a link to any published info on what the babies looked like?

    I believe that Ralph Davis is indicating that his leucistics might be recessive. Certainly that is a possibility but given that both parents where co-dominant morphs (and a little similar in my eyes) and all the other apparently co-dominant leucistic like balls popping up I'm suspicious that his are co-dominant too.

  6. #16
    BPnet Veteran Marla's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-30-2003
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    3,294
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
    Images: 47
    I remember reading on someone's site -- not sure whose, sorry -- that the author believed that ball python coloring was made up of a layer of white at the base and then layers of black, reddish brown, yellowish brown, and yellow. If this is correct, then it seems to me that there might be a few ways to produce leucistic-appearing animals: promote white to the top layer (black-eyed, I'm guessing), suppress all the other colors (blue-eyed, I'm guessing), incompletely suppress yellow and suppress all others (the faint yellow stripe), promote white and incompletely suppress yellow (faint yellow). If this is correct, then the first two lines ought to be incompatible with one another and the last two, but the last two might be compatible. Rather than being passed as genetic color-coding, it may be passed as lacking an enzyme or half an enzyme pair, which would explain incomplete or co-dominance.

    Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be much in the way of info and photos available yet on lucy offspring. It'll probably be another 2-5 seasons before we really have the answers to most of the questions we have about these beauties, and possibly longer before line compatibility is established.
    3.1.1 BP (Snyder, Hanover, Bo Peep, Sir NAITF, Eve), 1.2.3 Rhacodactylus ciliatus (Sandiego, Carmen, Scooby, Camo, BABIES ), 1.0 Chow (Buddha), 0.2 cats (Jezebel, PCBH "Nanners"), 0.3 humans
    xnview for resizing and coverting pics

    Support Ball-Pythons.net by shopping our store!

  7. #17
    Registered User
    Join Date
    01-06-2004
    Location
    Manchester, UK
    Posts
    50
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 14 Times in 7 Posts
    As the breeder of the Black-eyed leucistic, I will not make any claim as to whether they are a co-dominant or simple recessive gene until I have the results of this year's breeding. The lucy male has been bred to his mother,a Fireball female and four normal females. Bob Clark may well be right in saying that it is co-dominant, but I need to prove the theory beyond doubt. Eric Davies.

  8. #18
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    11-13-2003
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    1,555
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 247 Times in 186 Posts
    Images: 28
    Right after I posted this morning I realized that I incorrectly referred to Platy and Phantom as co-dominant. I guess at this point all we know is that they are "some kind of dominant" although I think the will turn out to be co-dominant.

    But it brings up a good question, how much proof is enough? Could you ever really be 100% sure? What if they had a recessive gene that just happened to be linked on the same chromosome with a co-dominant gene? You might go a long time without separating the two and proving the effect of the recessive gene as not co-dominant. I guess the big checker will be if the leucy doesn't produce any normals no matter what he is bred to. But how many babies will be enough to be sure?

  9. #19
    BPnet Veteran Marla's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-30-2003
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    3,294
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
    Images: 47
    Eric, thanks for stopping in and contributing to the discussion. I certainly look forward to seeing what you produce with these and what we can learn of the genetics involved.

    Randy, you raise a good point. I don't think we can ever be 100% sure without genetic testing and profiling. For our purposes, though, I'd think that if the leucistic produces no normals when it's bred with normals and other morphs, then that will be good enough evidence for me.
    3.1.1 BP (Snyder, Hanover, Bo Peep, Sir NAITF, Eve), 1.2.3 Rhacodactylus ciliatus (Sandiego, Carmen, Scooby, Camo, BABIES ), 1.0 Chow (Buddha), 0.2 cats (Jezebel, PCBH "Nanners"), 0.3 humans
    xnview for resizing and coverting pics

    Support Ball-Pythons.net by shopping our store!

  10. #20
    BPnet Veteran RPlank's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-01-2003
    Location
    Colorado, USA
    Posts
    730
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Images: 13
    Eric,
    We are glad to have you here, and would love to hear more about your breeding projects, if you are willing to share your knowledge and/or tips!
    Randy

    "I think it might be helpful for everyone to remember that the purpose of a forum like this is to EXCHANGE IDEAS, not dictate what is right or wrong or good or bad. If you disagree with what someone else is suggesting, you can say so without being argumentative or completely slamming the guy (or girl)." - Smynx

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1