Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 2,921

4 members and 2,917 guests
Most users ever online was 6,337, 01-24-2020 at 04:30 AM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,031
Threads: 248,489
Posts: 2,568,441
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, isismomma
Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Registered User USARK.Jonathan.Brady's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-02-2010
    Posts
    143
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 184 Times in 48 Posts

    Committee Hearing Shows Human Impact of Ohio Exotic Animal Legislation

    http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/...12+PRN20120329

    Committee Hearing Shows Human Impact of Ohio Exotic Animal Legislation; Public Safety or Politics?
    * Reuters is not responsible for the content in this press release.
    Thu Mar 29, 2012 5:00am EDT

    Committee Hearing Shows Human Impact of Ohio Exotic Animal Legislation; Public Safety or Politics?
    PR Newswire
    COLUMBUS, Ohio, March 29, 2012
    COLUMBUS, Ohio, March 29, 2012 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- On Tuesday of this week, in what turned out to be a marathon hearing before the Senate Agriculture, Environment & Natural Resources Committee dozens turned out to voice their displeasure with SB 310, the exotic animal ban introduced by Senator Troy Balderson from Zanesville, Ohio. SB 310 would regulate the ownership of some exotic animals while banning others; in the case of reptiles it would amount to a de-facto ban due to prohibitive permitting requirements, including exorbitant amounts of liability insurance, and high permitting fees. Most hearing attendees wore "NO SB310" badges handed out to 135 supporters by the US Association of Reptile Keepers who led the charge against SB 310. Committee Chair Hite did his best to hold the hearing together through two recesses, time delays, and three venue changes. The hearing scheduled for 10:45am did not come to conclusion until after 5pm due to an unexpectedly heavy turnout of speakers testifying in opposition to the bill.
    Senator Balderson, the bill sponsor, appeared to be frustrated at the numbers of individuals and organizations opposing his bill. The number of valid criticisms, with various counter proposals for amendments became more than tedious. In fairness, the bill appears to be more than the Senator really wanted, and he seems open to constructive changes. Critics ranged from school teachers, students and 'soccer moms', to private zoos and professional Herpetologists. The most outspoken of critics was Andrew Wyatt of the US Association of Reptile Keepers (USARK). Wyatt stated that 90% of the impact, and 90% of the opposition to SB 310 came from the Reptile Industry. "We provide animals and husbandry products for zoos, museums, research facilities, TV & Film, hobbyists and the pet trade. This is professional non-traditional agricultural known as Herpetoculture, the production of high quality, captive-bred reptiles; it is a$30 million annual trade in Ohio. Wyatt noted that the Columbus Zoo acquired their most popular exhibit, a reticulated python named Fluffy, from a USARK member. In his most pointed criticism Wyatt asserted, "A reasoned and rational argument cannot be made that working with ANY reptiles presents any more public safety risk than traditional livestock and pets for which we readily accept the limited risks".
    At the end of a long day of testimony, many Committee Members may have felt that they heard more than they ever wanted to about this issue. The overwhelming sentiment was that it may be hard for the Committee to ignore the limited public safety risk posed by the Reptile Industry, especially when taken in the context of the much higher, but acceptable, risk posed by traditional pets and livestock. USARK opposes SB 310 and is requesting that all reptiles be removed from the bill. It appears likely that another Hearing will be held on April 17th and any changes deemed necessary by the Committee will be done prior to a vote.
    SOURCE United States Association of Reptile Keepers (USARK)
    For questions and comments, please email
    USARK.Jonathan.Brady@gmail.com
    JOIN USARK! http://www.usark.org/join.php

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to USARK.Jonathan.Brady For This Useful Post:

    mikel81 (03-29-2012),RestlessRobie (03-29-2012),Wh00h0069 (03-29-2012)

  3. #2
    BPnet Veteran tcutting's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-11-2011
    Location
    Coopersburg, PA
    Posts
    834
    Thanks
    159
    Thanked 221 Times in 180 Posts
    Images: 51
    Now if only in RI they had the same turn out perhaps that would have saved that bil from being pasted.
    1.0 Normal Ball Python
    1.0 Normal Het Orange Ghost Ball Python
    0.1 Mojave Ball python
    0.1 Orange Ghost Ball python
    0.1 Orange Ghost Het Caramel Ball python
    0.1 Spotted Python
    1.0 Jungle Carpet Python

  4. #3
    BPnet Veteran The Serpent Merchant's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-15-2011
    Location
    Orlando, Florida
    Posts
    8,193
    Thanks
    1,504
    Thanked 3,300 Times in 2,344 Posts
    I saw this on iHerp earlier it's great that there was such a good turn out it's a good start.
    ~Aaron

    0.1 Pastel 100% Het Clown Ball Python (Hestia)
    1.0 Coastal/Jungle Carpet Python (Shagrath)
    0.1 Dumeril's Boa (Nergal)

    0.1 Bearded Dragon (Gaius)

    1.0 Siberian Husky (Picard)
    0.1 German Shepherd/Lab Mix (Jadzia)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1