Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 3,117

0 members and 3,117 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 6,337, 01-24-2020 at 04:30 AM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,093
Threads: 248,535
Posts: 2,568,703
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Amethyst42
Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 47
  1. #11
    BPnet Veteran Herp Hugger's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-07-2009
    Location
    Southern Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    225
    Thanks
    55
    Thanked 54 Times in 54 Posts
    Images: 28

    Question Re: Congressional Budget Office to "Score" HR2811

    Does anyone know if there is an association similar to USARK in Canada? I'm sure if the USA is dealing with this kind of legislation, we can't be too far behind.

    Thanks!
    -------------------------------------------
    Jim


    1.0 Banana Black Pastel (Nolan)

  2. #12
    BPnet Veteran omnibus2's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-10-2009
    Posts
    318
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 31 Times in 30 Posts
    Images: 1

    Re: Congressional Budget Office to "Score" HR2811

    Quote Originally Posted by lepidunce View Post
    Honestly, because of the few irresponsible owners out there, that ruin it for everyone, I believe that Instead of "permits" there should be mandatory classes, and a mandatory test. Just like a drivers license. There are drivers licenses because irresponsible people get themselves or others killed. Same with VERY few snake owners (those are the idiots that ruin it for everyone). It would fend away impulse buyers (mostly), and educate the uninformed, if they still want to go through with it. THATS what needs to happen, because if you care about your herps, you'll go. You'll pay attention, and you'll pass the test. Just a thought. Forget permits that cost so many hundred dollars. Instead, make licenses that you have to take tests for. I know I would sit through a year of day in day out classes for my herp. Would you? Exactly. REAL snake owners would put in the time. Just my .
    I understand your good intent, but I think that's a terrible idea. There are plenty of people who wouldn't have bothered getting a ball python if they had to take classes (not everyone has time to spare), but ended up being involved members in the hobby, or even breeders. Not everybody is a devoted herper when they get their first snake.
    For every 15-foot python out in the Everglades, there are thousands of species of clams, trees, cats, grasses and birds that are wrecking just as much havoc across the globe. So, for all the headaches the snakes are causing, I at least applaud them for being scary enough to get people's attention.

  3. #13
    BPnet Veteran I<3Dreamsicles's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-15-2009
    Posts
    960
    Thanks
    402
    Thanked 197 Times in 190 Posts
    Images: 8

    Re: Congressional Budget Office to "Score" HR2811

    Quote Originally Posted by omnibus2 View Post
    I understand your good intent, but I think that's a terrible idea. There are plenty of people who wouldn't have bothered getting a ball python if they had to take classes (not everyone has time to spare), but ended up being involved members in the hobby, or even breeders. Not everybody is a devoted herper when they get their first snake.
    I think its supposed to be more focused on large species. The only benifit of having classes for smaller snakes would be for the animals well being. And I doubt that the government really cares about that.

    Everyone should at least have SOME knowledge of what their getting no matter what it is. Its not like its hard to type in "ball python care sheet" on google.
    This is my signature
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    0.1 Normal BP
    1.0 Green Iguana
    0.1 Dog
    0.1 Cat


    Graffiti Is Art
    Judge me

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to I<3Dreamsicles For This Useful Post:

    iloveleucie63 (10-13-2009)

  5. #14
    BPnet Veteran nixer's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-28-2007
    Location
    indiana
    Posts
    2,827
    Thanks
    339
    Thanked 329 Times in 294 Posts
    Images: 3

    Re: Congressional Budget Office to "Score" HR2811

    Quote Originally Posted by I<3Dreamsicles View Post
    I think its supposed to be more focused on large species. The only benifit of having classes for smaller snakes would be for the animals well being. And I doubt that the government really cares about that.

    Everyone should at least have SOME knowledge of what their getting no matter what it is. Its not like its hard to type in "ball python care sheet" on google.
    i agree, but i dont think reading a few caresheets are going to qualify anyone for any permit. its not going to be cheap period. they have to make money on the permit system in order for it to work out for them or there will be no one to even approve the permits, just like in guam

  6. #15
    BPnet Senior Member Denial's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-21-2009
    Location
    Greenville, SC
    Posts
    2,553
    Thanks
    775
    Thanked 657 Times in 327 Posts

    Re: Congressional Budget Office to "Score" HR2811

    Quote Originally Posted by I<3Dreamsicles View Post
    The ammendment that usark pushed them into is what they should have started off with in the first place, not the total ban of all pythons. Get it pushed more for no importing. Who needs imports anyway. Maybe INCLUDE something about permits???? No imports, but the ability to trade within the country, and/or require permits.
    We all need imports. Thats how alot of new morphs have gotten here.
    If you look at the import numbers with african rocks and burmese pythons compared to some other python species is pathetic. What if this were to ban the importation of ball pythons? There would be alot more buzz in it.

  7. #16
    BPnet Veteran I<3Dreamsicles's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-15-2009
    Posts
    960
    Thanks
    402
    Thanked 197 Times in 190 Posts
    Images: 8

    Re: Congressional Budget Office to "Score" HR2811

    Quote Originally Posted by nixer View Post
    i agree, but i dont think reading a few caresheets are going to qualify anyone for any permit. its not going to be cheap period. they have to make money on the permit system in order for it to work out for them or there will be no one to even approve the permits, just like in guam
    Well yes, but say for a drivers license. It doesnt cost tons of money to get one. They should have something like that, and really I dont think it would be that bad just to have someone check on the enclosure they plan to use to "approve" of it. Or on a license test have some mock up situations that make the person think, like ask what they would do if theyre snake went missing, or how would they prevent it etc.

    Quote Originally Posted by Denial View Post
    We all need imports. Thats how alot of new morphs have gotten here.
    If you look at the import numbers with african rocks and burmese pythons compared to some other python species is pathetic. What if this were to ban the importation of ball pythons? There would be alot more buzz in it.
    Yeah I realized that after I posted, but I was more focused on wild caught types, but the trade of morphs internationally would be something that should be able to happen. I really dont know. I couldnt tell you how the government views any kind of breeding for animals that arent a wild type/ "normal". Even if they did ban the imports of ball pythons, what im saying is that we still have tons of morphs available here already, and stuff that can be mixed so its not like theres an end to all morphs and BP breeding.
    This is my signature
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    0.1 Normal BP
    1.0 Green Iguana
    0.1 Dog
    0.1 Cat


    Graffiti Is Art
    Judge me

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to I<3Dreamsicles For This Useful Post:

    iloveleucie63 (10-13-2009)

  9. #17
    Registered User lepidunce's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-21-2009
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    38
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Re: Congressional Budget Office to "Score" HR2811

    Quote Originally Posted by omnibus2 View Post
    There are plenty of people who wouldn't have bothered getting a ball python if they had to take classes (not everyone has time to spare), but ended up being involved members in the hobby, or even breeders. Not everybody is a devoted herper when they get their first snake.
    Sorry, I guess I should have made all that clear. I just meant classes for certain species of snakes, namely snakes that get to be over eight feet long. Also, if we could get rid of the small, small chunk of people that impulse buy retics, rocks, etc. for their first herp with no idea that they will get X feet long, we would be seen better by the media, and public in general. Because when it all boils down, which section of this community gets the lime light the most? The people that probably need those classes. I just think those classes would make the impulse buyers hesitate, and possibly become better keepers because they know what they are getting into, instead of getting on channel five because they hit the lottery with a "gentle giant" of a blood, and hurting someone. In short, let's try to educate the idiots BEFORE they do stuff that gets a new HR2811 passed.

    Edit: thanks, I <3 Dreamsicles. You summed up the class thing for me.
    Last edited by lepidunce; 10-11-2009 at 04:24 PM.
    1.0 normal (Pickles the drummer)

  10. #18
    BPnet Veteran MattU's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-03-2009
    Location
    North Alabama
    Posts
    339
    Thanks
    56
    Thanked 44 Times in 44 Posts

    Re: Congressional Budget Office to "Score" HR2811

    I'm afraid I'd have to go against the idea of a permit, license, or anything else of that manner. A license is, at it's base, permission from the government to do something illegal(Meaning that if you don't have a license, can you own the animal? No. Why? It would be illegal). If we accept the idea of licensing, for anything, we are accepting that it is illegal. At that point, politicians can slowly make it more and more difficult to acquire the license, to the point of near or total impossibility. It's really a matter of liberty.

  11. #19
    BPnet Veteran I<3Dreamsicles's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-15-2009
    Posts
    960
    Thanks
    402
    Thanked 197 Times in 190 Posts
    Images: 8

    Re: Congressional Budget Office to "Score" HR2811

    Quote Originally Posted by MattU View Post
    I'm afraid I'd have to go against the idea of a permit, license, or anything else of that manner. A license is, at it's base, permission from the government to do something illegal(Meaning that if you don't have a license, can you own the animal? No. Why? It would be illegal). If we accept the idea of licensing, for anything, we are accepting that it is illegal. At that point, politicians can slowly make it more and more difficult to acquire the license, to the point of near or total impossibility. It's really a matter of liberty.
    Some times things like that are needed because of a few idiots. Why do you think they have driving licenses and gun permits? Stupid people. Have they tried to get rid of cars or guns? Not really.
    This is my signature
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    0.1 Normal BP
    1.0 Green Iguana
    0.1 Dog
    0.1 Cat


    Graffiti Is Art
    Judge me

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to I<3Dreamsicles For This Useful Post:

    iloveleucie63 (10-13-2009)

  13. #20
    BPnet Veteran MattU's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-03-2009
    Location
    North Alabama
    Posts
    339
    Thanks
    56
    Thanked 44 Times in 44 Posts

    Re: Congressional Budget Office to "Score" HR2811

    Quote Originally Posted by I<3Dreamsicles View Post
    Some times things like that are needed because of a few idiots. Why do you think they have driving licenses and gun permits? Stupid people. Have they tried to get rid of cars or guns? Not really.
    "Not really" would be the important part there. "Not really", but somewhat. They have some serious restrictions on them, especially on guns. Yes, as crazy as it sounds to some people, I am against those licenses too. But that's not the point of this particular discussion. What it boils down to, and keep in mind this is only my opinion, is that I don't feel the need to acquire permission from some bureaucrat to own a kingsnake, or a ball python, or a 20 foot retic. That's my business, as long as it doesn't harm anyone else.

    Like I said though, just my opinion.

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to MattU For This Useful Post:

    nixer (10-12-2009)

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1