Re: So what is the math behind a punnet square?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
thb
So we cant conclude that right there is no perfect calculator online for Balls ;)
yet ;)
Re: So what is the math behind a punnet square?
Sorry guys, I have no idea how to test this other than to post it, hopefully I get this figured out soon and then i can post the site link so people can help me troubleshoot it.
Re: So what is the math behind a punnet square?
Alrite guys, here the skeleton version, so go ahead and tear it apart and lemme know whats screwed up. I tested it on firefox 3.6.13 and IE 8. so if you use another browser and have problems lemme know. Also just need comments on how it works as far as functions, layout, and accuracy, I will make it look better sometime later. just grabbed a default web template lol.
some things I still have to add:
Make auto suggest work with arrow keys, you click on em with your mouse right now.
Add Rules for complexes
Add combo names (ex. "Homozygous Pastel" replaced with "Super Pastel" or "Pastel/Spider" with Bumblebee)
Side notes for complex genes
http://matchheadstudios.com/mattsroot/genetics.php
Re: So what is the math behind a punnet square?
Sweet calculator. Must be quite some programmer behind it.
Re: So what is the math behind a punnet square?
It looks like good start :)
Here are some things:
- Morph list is small
- It doesnt calc the genes together (het albino, het albino should say homo albino)
- It prints homo (super) with dom x dom breeding
- It works wrong with the crazy genes.
- You are missing combo names ( as you wrote your self )
Re: So what is the math behind a punnet square?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
thb
It looks like good start :)
Here are some things:
- Morph list is small
- It doesnt calc the genes together (het albino, het albino should say homo albino)
- It prints homo (super) with dom x dom breeding
- It works wrong with the crazy genes.
- You are missing combo names ( as you wrote your self )
i have every single proven base morph on the list, unless you see one I missed? lemme know
seems to work to me?
all doms should have a homozygous form, just it will look like the heterozygous version, only proven ones are the congo and pinstripe tho. all the other ones are unproven.
still gotta work on the complex stuff and replace combo names yea
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gloryhound
These calculators are all cool little bells and whistles, but it takes the fun away. I love sitting down and doing ball python Punnett squarse. That is part of the fun in the hobby. Ball python genetics to date are pretty simple and straight forward. Now I am trying to work into corn snake genetics, these buggers are confusing due to cross interactions and such. I guess the crosses are kinda like the Leucistic complex in balls, but we will see if I can get my head wrapped around them.
once your doing 3 genes it can get annoying, pewter/lesser x pewter/lesser, your looking at 64 squares and alot of combining