Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 845

1 members and 844 guests
Most users ever online was 6,337, 01-24-2020 at 04:30 AM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,077
Threads: 248,523
Posts: 2,568,612
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, jpriebe2
Page 6 of 11 FirstFirst 1234567891011 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 108

Thread: Sulfur = Fire

  1. #51
    BPnet Veteran envy_ld50's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-28-2008
    Location
    Gilbert,Az
    Posts
    299
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked 30 Times in 19 Posts
    Images: 1

    Re: Sulfur = Fire

    Again the only objections for keeping it known as the sulfur at this moment are the unknowns the ifs & maybe's. I guess some people don't care about the fact that this will become rampant in the hobby soon if we don't clear it up now. In the end if you produce a new morph I can buy the same snake that may look slight different in shade and or pattern and say it is different. How would you feel if this eventually happened to you? Maybe I should go to petco and buy a ball and say hey it looks kind of lightly colored and if it throws a light baby in a few years then I can call it a light ball ball python and sell it for 1,500.
    -Cliff-
    SulfurPythons.com -COMING SOON-

  2. #52
    BPnet Veteran envy_ld50's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-28-2008
    Location
    Gilbert,Az
    Posts
    299
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked 30 Times in 19 Posts
    Images: 1

    Re: Sulfur = Fire

    Quote Originally Posted by SUPERBALLS View Post
    blood test! sense when did we need that to determine genetics of ball python morphs, i dont think comparing fires and sulfers to cinnamons and blacks is to far off. like i said they also have differnt looks just like the cinny and black and there combos are different looking to, but still have the same super
    I currently have a super cinny en route. It is not the same mutation as a super black pastel. It has silver and a dark grey color to it. The super black pastels are almost pitch black. Super fires/sulfurs are identical. No shade difference at all. And fires and sulfurs are also the same. I would bet even though you say they look the same if I took clutches from both you couldn't separate them correctly. With cinny's and black pastels I bet you could.
    -Cliff-
    SulfurPythons.com -COMING SOON-

  3. #53
    BPnet Veteran SUPERBALLS's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-26-2006
    Posts
    758
    Thanks
    292
    Thanked 31 Times in 28 Posts
    Images: 66

    Re: Sulfur = Fire

    Quote Originally Posted by envy_ld50 View Post
    Again the only objections for keeping it known as the sulfur at this moment are the unknowns the ifs & maybe's. I guess some people don't care about the fact that this will become rampant in the hobby soon if we don't clear it up now. In the end if you produce a new morph I can buy the same snake that may look slight different in shade and or pattern and say it is different. How would you feel if this eventually happened to you? Maybe I should go to petco and buy a ball and say hey it looks kind of lightly colored and if it throws a light baby in a few years then I can call it a light ball ball python and sell it for 1,500.
    so are you argueing the piont that a cinny is the same as a black pastel cause im telling you this seems to be the same situation because in reallity cinny and black are differnt morphs, just like the butters and lesser

  4. #54
    BPnet Veteran PythonWallace's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-26-2007
    Location
    Woodridge, IL
    Posts
    2,967
    Thanks
    204
    Thanked 346 Times in 210 Posts
    Images: 23

    Re: Sulfur = Fire

    Quote Originally Posted by envy_ld50 View Post
    Again the only objections for keeping it known as the sulfur at this moment are the unknowns the ifs & maybe's. I guess some people don't care about the fact that this will become rampant in the hobby soon if we don't clear it up now. In the end if you produce a new morph I can buy the same snake that may look slight different in shade and or pattern and say it is different. How would you feel if this eventually happened to you? Maybe I should go to petco and buy a ball and say hey it looks kind of lightly colored and if it throws a light baby in a few years then I can call it a light ball ball python and sell it for 1,500.
    You can, and people do, but they usually go for about $150. If you prove a c.h. or w.c as a genetic light ball and sell them as genetic light balls for $1,500, then more power to you.
    What are these mojavas I keep hearing so much about?

    J. W. Exotics

    Reptile Incubators

  5. #55
    BPnet Veteran SUPERBALLS's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-26-2006
    Posts
    758
    Thanks
    292
    Thanked 31 Times in 28 Posts
    Images: 66

    Re: Sulfur = Fire

    Quote Originally Posted by envy_ld50 View Post
    I currently have a super cinny en route. It is not the same mutation as a super black pastel. It has silver and a dark grey color to it. The super black pastels are almost pitch black. Super fires/sulfurs are identical. No shade difference at all. And fires and sulfurs are also the same. I would bet even though you say they look the same if I took clutches from both you couldn't separate them correctly. With cinny's and black pastels I bet you could.
    yoru telling me you cant tell the difference in a fire and sulpher or there combos like the fire pastel and sulpher pastel cause i sure as hell can, and im not saying there as differnt as cinnys are to blacks, but i think its still the same genetic style

  6. #56
    West Coast Jungle's Avatar
    Join Date
    11-07-2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    8,184
    Thanks
    624
    Thanked 1,370 Times in 943 Posts
    Images: 43

    Re: Sulfur = Fire

    My point is they are different lines.

    No one has a problem saying Graziani cinny or pastel. Or BHB cinny or nerd lemon pastel. It is understood they are different lines yet the same morph.

    I think this is the same concept adding the fact that no one has yet to prove the Fires and Sulphurs are compatable. That is an assumption untill proven to be genetically true.

    I understand where you are coming from but just because the supers are similar doesnt make them the same exact morph quite yet until proven and even then they would still be different lines.

    Vin Russo's, mojaves, butters and lessers make BEL's but they arent the same morphs?

    I have seen Amirs black eyed line hets (hypo glows) in person and they are visibly different than fires yet they produce similar supers.

    It is important to distinguish lines so future breeders can have more knowledge of the genetic pool they are working with and make there choices accordingly.

  7. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to West Coast Jungle For This Useful Post:

    MarkS (10-22-2008),muddoc (10-22-2008),purplemuffin (01-30-2011)

  8. #57
    BPnet Veteran SUPERBALLS's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-26-2006
    Posts
    758
    Thanks
    292
    Thanked 31 Times in 28 Posts
    Images: 66

    Re: Sulfur = Fire

    Quote Originally Posted by PythonWallace View Post
    You can, and people do, but they usually go for about $150. If you prove a c.h. or w.c as a genetic light ball and sell them as genetic light balls for $1,500, then more power to you.
    i agree, if your serious about this hobby and spend $1,500 on a morph and get burned or buy the same morph as another one for less, its your fault you need to reaserch before purchasing, or deciede that your ok paying more for somthing potentilly different

  9. #58
    BPnet Veteran SUPERBALLS's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-26-2006
    Posts
    758
    Thanks
    292
    Thanked 31 Times in 28 Posts
    Images: 66

    Re: Sulfur = Fire

    Quote Originally Posted by West Coast Jungle View Post
    My point is they are different lines.

    No one has a problem saying Graziani cinny or pastel. Or BHB cinny or nerd lemon pastel. It is understood they are different lines yet the same morph.

    I think this is the same concept adding the fact that no one has yet to prove the Fires and Sulphurs are compatable. That is an assumption untill proven to be genetically true.

    I understand where you are coming from but just because the supers are similar doesnt make them the same exact morph quite yet until proven and even then they would still be different lines.

    Vin Russo's, mojaves, butters and lessers make BEL's but they arent the same morphs?

    I have seen Amirs black eyed line hets (hypo glows) in person and they are visibly different than fires yet they produce similar supers.

    It is important to distinguish lines so future breeders can have more knowledge of the genetic pool they are working with and make there choices accordingly.
    bang!!!!!!!!!! right on the head, thank you, i really belive they are different lines and maybe a different morph all together

  10. #59
    BPnet Veteran envy_ld50's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-28-2008
    Location
    Gilbert,Az
    Posts
    299
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked 30 Times in 19 Posts
    Images: 1

    Re: Sulfur = Fire

    Again I have seen both and they both look like fires. They both vary in color and pattern. Many other breeders I know and talk to have agreed with me that this type of think needs to be fixed. I know that alot of people will defend so called lines and unproven morphs just because others do. But simply if it's unproven it's unproven! And there is really no way to argue that. I will believe something is different when I see it proven. No disrespect to the sulfur combos because fires are my favorite and the combos are identical so I love them.
    -Cliff-
    SulfurPythons.com -COMING SOON-

  11. #60
    BPnet Veteran envy_ld50's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-28-2008
    Location
    Gilbert,Az
    Posts
    299
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked 30 Times in 19 Posts
    Images: 1

    Re: Sulfur = Fire

    Quote Originally Posted by West Coast Jungle View Post
    My point is they are different lines.

    No one has a problem saying Graziani cinny or pastel. Or BHB cinny or nerd lemon pastel. It is understood they are different lines yet the same morph.

    I think this is the same concept adding the fact that no one has yet to prove the Fires and Sulphurs are compatable. That is an assumption untill proven to be genetically true.

    I understand where you are coming from but just because the supers are similar doesnt make them the same exact morph quite yet until proven and even then they would still be different lines.

    Vin Russo's, mojaves, butters and lessers make BEL's but they arent the same morphs?

    I have seen Amirs black eyed line hets (hypo glows) in person and they are visibly different than fires yet they produce similar supers.

    It is important to distinguish lines so future breeders can have more knowledge of the genetic pool they are working with and make there choices accordingly.
    A lot of people must not be reading the whole thread. I have said all along the morph needs to be proven. And that breeders SHOULD distinguish thier lines if they choose like BHB and Graziani have done. Certain posters are not reading and fully understanding what is being said. But I agree with you Raul. We need to take the time to prove out our animals.
    -Cliff-
    SulfurPythons.com -COMING SOON-

Page 6 of 11 FirstFirst 1234567891011 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1