Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 2,912

0 members and 2,912 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 6,337, 01-24-2020 at 04:30 AM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,031
Threads: 248,489
Posts: 2,568,446
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, isismomma
Results 1 to 10 of 108

Thread: Sulfur = Fire

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    BPnet Veteran envy_ld50's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-28-2008
    Location
    Gilbert,Az
    Posts
    299
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked 30 Times in 19 Posts
    Images: 1

    Sulfur = Fire

    Okay this has been eating away at me for awhile now. From the begging of the sulfur inception they were thought to be fires but were not acquired from a proven line. I cant stress this enough but this is why you need to hold back your project and prove it out! Don't start selling snakes as a new unknown morph! What would one do if they had somehow acquired a snake that looked different than a normal but similar to another morph? I for one would first try to prove a super and then do crosses. The Sulfur is 100% a fire until there is undisputed proof it is not. The super is the same, crosses appear to be visually the same as well. I understand people want to defend sulfur's as they payed more for them and want to have an exclusive morph. However I think we need to start proving projects out before slapping new names on proven morphs. That's my 2 cents.
    -Cliff-
    SulfurPythons.com -COMING SOON-

  2. #2
    BPnet Veteran nevohraalnavnoj's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-04-2007
    Location
    Norfolk, Virginia
    Posts
    1,098
    Thanks
    57
    Thanked 102 Times in 69 Posts
    Images: 1

    Re: Sulfur = Fire

    Quote Originally Posted by envy_ld50 View Post
    The Sulfur is 100% a fire until there is undisputed proof it is not.
    Wouldn't it be the exact opposite? Isn't that like saying VPI Axanthics and TSK Axanthics are compatible until proven otherwise? Isn't the impetus for proving compatibility on the producer claiming the compatibility?

    Or maybe I am not understanding the argument in question?

    JonV

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to nevohraalnavnoj For This Useful Post:

    juddb (11-28-2008)

  4. #3
    BPnet Veteran Jerhart's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-06-2007
    Location
    Spring Hill, Kansas
    Posts
    3,028
    Thanks
    328
    Thanked 581 Times in 406 Posts

    Re: Sulfur = Fire

    Isnt a super sulphur a Black eyed leucy...while a super fire is a blue eyed leucy? I am new to Suphurs so I am not sure if I have this right.....but I for one believe they are different from the FIRE.
    ____JOSHUA____
    ______
    ROCK CHALK JAYHAWK GO KU!!

    Kansas City Chiefs

  5. #4
    BPnet Veteran PythonWallace's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-26-2007
    Location
    Woodridge, IL
    Posts
    2,967
    Thanks
    204
    Thanked 346 Times in 210 Posts
    Images: 23

    Re: Sulfur = Fire

    Quote Originally Posted by Jerhart View Post
    Isnt a super suphur a Black eyed leucy...while a super fire is a blue eyed leucy?
    Fires are het for black eyed leucistic.
    What are these mojavas I keep hearing so much about?

    J. W. Exotics

    Reptile Incubators

  6. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to PythonWallace For This Useful Post:

    envy_ld50 (10-21-2008),juddb (11-28-2008)

  7. #5
    BPnet Veteran Jerhart's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-06-2007
    Location
    Spring Hill, Kansas
    Posts
    3,028
    Thanks
    328
    Thanked 581 Times in 406 Posts

    Re: Sulfur = Fire

    Quote Originally Posted by PythonWallace View Post
    Fires are het for black eyed leucistic.
    Gotchya! Thanks!
    ____JOSHUA____
    ______
    ROCK CHALK JAYHAWK GO KU!!

    Kansas City Chiefs

  8. #6
    BPnet Veteran nevohraalnavnoj's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-04-2007
    Location
    Norfolk, Virginia
    Posts
    1,098
    Thanks
    57
    Thanked 102 Times in 69 Posts
    Images: 1

    Re: Sulfur = Fire

    Quote Originally Posted by PythonWallace View Post
    Fires are het for black eyed leucistic.
    Are sulfurs as well?

    JonV

  9. #7
    BPnet Veteran Wh00h0069's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-30-2007
    Location
    Middletown, OH
    Posts
    4,349
    Thanks
    915
    Thanked 832 Times in 736 Posts
    Images: 8

    Re: Sulfur = Fire

    Quote Originally Posted by nevohraalnavnoj View Post
    Are sulfurs as well?

    JonV
    Yes
    Eddie Strong, Jr.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Wh00h0069 For This Useful Post:

    envy_ld50 (10-21-2008)

  11. #8
    BPnet Veteran nevohraalnavnoj's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-04-2007
    Location
    Norfolk, Virginia
    Posts
    1,098
    Thanks
    57
    Thanked 102 Times in 69 Posts
    Images: 1

    Re: Sulfur = Fire

    So the issue in question is whether sulfurs have something "extra" to warrant them being different from fires? Or are they just fires with a higher price tag? Is that what the argument is about?

    JonV

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1